Literature DB >> 19226310

To P(E) or not to P(E): a P3-like ERP component reflecting the processing of response errors.

K Richard Ridderinkhof1, Jennifer R Ramautar, Jasper G Wijnen.   

Abstract

ERP studies have highlighted several electrocortical components that can be observed when people make errors. We propose that the P(E) reflects processes functionally similar to those reflected in the P3 and that the P(E) and P3 should covary. We speculate that these processes refer to the motivational significance of rare target stimuli in case of the P3 and of salient performance errors in case of the P(E). Here we investigated whether P(E) amplitude after errors in a Simon task is correlated specifically to varying target-target intervals in a visual oddball task, a factor known to parametrically affect P3 amplitude. The amplitude of the P(E), but not the N(E), was observed to covary with the effect of target-target interval on P3 amplitude. The specificity of this novel finding supports the notion that the P(E) and P3 reflect similar neurocognitive processes as possibly involved in the conscious processing of motivationally significant events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19226310     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00790.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  67 in total

1.  The development of the error-related negativity (ERN) and its relationship with anxiety: evidence from 8 to 13 year-olds.

Authors:  Alexandria Meyer; Anna Weinberg; Daniel N Klein; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.464

2.  Monoaminergic modulation of behavioural and electrophysiological indices of error processing.

Authors:  Jessica J M Barnes; Redmond G O'Connell; L Sanjay Nandam; Angela J Dean; Mark A Bellgrove
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Anxiety not only increases, but also alters early error-monitoring functions.

Authors:  Kristien Aarts; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Outcome expectancy and not accuracy determines posterror slowing: ERP support.

Authors:  Elena Núñez Castellar; Simone Kühn; Wim Fias; Wim Notebaert
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 5.  Systematic review of ERP and fMRI studies investigating inhibitory control and error processing in people with substance dependence and behavioural addictions.

Authors:  Maartje Luijten; Marise W J Machielsen; Dick J Veltman; Robert Hester; Lieuwe de Haan; Ingmar H A Franken
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 6.186

6.  Error-monitoring and post-error compensations: dissociation between perceptual failures and motor errors with and without awareness.

Authors:  Ana Navarro-Cebrian; Robert T Knight; Andrew S Kayser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Electrocortical and behavioral measures of response monitoring in young children during a Go/No-Go task.

Authors:  Dana C Torpey; Greg Hajcak; Jiyon Kim; Autumn Kujawa; Daniel N Klein
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.038

8.  Coupling electrophysiological and hemodynamic responses to errors.

Authors:  Nuria Doñamayor; Urs Heilbronner; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Neural correlates of performance monitoring in chronic cannabis users and cannabis-naive controls.

Authors:  Daniel J Fridberg; Patrick D Skosnik; William P Hetrick; Brian F O'Donnell
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.153

Review 10.  Conscious perception of errors and its relation to the anterior insula.

Authors:  Markus Ullsperger; Helga A Harsay; Jan R Wessel; K Richard Ridderinkhof
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 3.270

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.