Literature DB >> 19226235

Four tensions concerning mathematical modeling in psychology.

R D Luce1.   

Abstract

Year:  1995        PMID： 19226235     DOI： 10.1146/annurev.ps.46.020195.000245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol        ISSN： 0066-4308            Impact factor:   24.137


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Testing transitivity of preferences on two-alternative forced choice data.

Authors:  Michel Regenwetter; Jason Dana; Clintin P Davis-Stober
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-12-13

2.  Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness Against Null Hypothesis Significance Testing.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.821

3.  QTest: Quantitative Testing of Theories of Binary Choice.

Authors:  Michel Regenwetter; Clintin P Davis-Stober; Shiau Hong Lim; Ying Guo; Anna Popova; Chris Zwilling; Yun-Shil Cha; William Messner
Journal:  Decisions       Date:  2014-01

4.  Quantitative methods in psychology: inevitable and useless.

Authors:  Aaro Toomela
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-07-30

Review 5.  A framework for building cognitive process models.

Authors:  Jana B Jarecki; Jolene H Tan; Mirjam A Jenny
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-12

6.  The Balance-Scale Task Revisited: A Comparison of Statistical Models for Rule-Based and Information-Integration Theories of Proportional Reasoning.

Authors:  Abe D Hofman; Ingmar Visser; Brenda R J Jansen; Han L J van der Maas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.