Literature DB >> 19226040

Histologic evaluation of high speed burr shavings collected during spinal decompression surgery.

Vikas V Patel1, Susan M Estes, Erick M Naar, Emily M Lindley, Evalina Burger.   

Abstract

In spinal decompression and fusion surgery, a high speed burr is often used to remove bony material. The generated bone shavings are typically washed away and discarded. This study histologically examined the content of burr shavings to determine whether the collected tissue has the potential to augment local autograft. Our findings verified that burr shavings collected during spinal decompression are primarily composed of bone (65%) with blood product (32%). The bone shavings appear to remain viable after burring, as there was no microscopic evidence of damage to the cells. These findings indicate that bone shavings can be easily collected and could be added to local laminectomy bone with minimal cost. This technique is also beneficial given that it does not increase morbidity, as does iliac crest bone graft harvesting. Furthermore, the putty-like consistency of the bone shavings may facilitate the placement of morselized autograft bone. Despite these advantages, collected bone shavings are by no means a substitute for autograft or allograft bone. Their osteogenic potential is not comparable to that of iliac crest bone and the shavings lack the structural scaffolding of allograft bone. This technique, however, provides a resource for augmenting local autograft during spinal fusion, and is not associated with any significant cost or effort. Future studies should compare the clinical and radiographic fusion outcomes of high speed burr bony shavings combined with local laminectomy bone versus either iliac crest autograft or local laminectomy bone used with other bone graft extenders.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19226040     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20090101-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  6 in total

1.  Autografts for spinal fusion: osteogenic potential of laminectomy bone chips and bone shavings collected via high speed drill.

Authors:  Claudia Eder; Albert Chavanne; Jochen Meissner; Wolfgang Bretschneider; Alexander Tuschel; Philipp Becker; Michael Ogon
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of fusion rate enhancements and bone graft options for spine surgery.

Authors:  Wagner M Tavares; Sabrina Araujo de França; Wellingson S Paiva; Manoel J Teixeira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Bone grafting options for lumbar spine surgery: a review examining clinical efficacy and complications.

Authors:  Kenneth Vaz; Kushagra Verma; Themistocles Protopsaltis; Frank Schwab; Baron Lonner; Thomas Errico
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2010-09-01

4.  Lumbar Spine Fusion Rates With Local Bone in Posterolateral and Combined Posterolateral and Interbody Approaches.

Authors:  Daniel K Park; Richard Roberts; Paul Arnold; David H Kim; Rick Sasso; Kevin C Baker; Jeffrey S Fischgrund
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2019-11-04

5.  Aerosol morphology and particle size distribution in orthopaedic bone machining: a laboratory worst-case contamination simulation. Is high-speed bone machining potentially harmful by pollution and quality schemes and what measures could be taken for prevention?

Authors:  David Putzer; Dietmar Dammerer; Cora Huber; Harald Boschert; Martin Thaler; Michael Nogler
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.479

6.  Using a mixture of local bone dust and morselized bone as graft materials in single- and double-level ACDF.

Authors:  Fei Ma; Shicai Xu; Yehui Liao; Qiang Tang; Chao Tang; Qing Wang; Dejun Zhong
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.