Literature DB >> 19225870

Mechanical and in vitro performance of apatite-wollastonite glass ceramic reinforced hydroxyapatite composite fabricated by 3D-printing.

J Suwanprateeb1, R Sanngam, W Suvannapruk, T Panyathanmaporn.   

Abstract

In situ hydroxyapatite/apatite-wollastonite glass ceramic composite was fabricated by a three dimensional printing (3DP) technique and characterized. It was found that the as-fabricated mean green strength of the composite was 1.27 MPa which was sufficient for general handling. After varying sintering temperatures (1050-1300 degrees C) and times (1-10 h), it was found that sintering at 1300 degrees C for 3 h gave the greatest flexural modulus and strength, 34.10 GPa and 76.82 MPa respectively. This was associated with a decrease in porosity and increase in densification ability of the composite resulting from liquid phase sintering. Bioactivity tested by soaking in simulated body fluid (SBF) and In Vitro toxicity studies showed that 3DP hydroxyapatite/A-W glass ceramic composite was non-toxic and bioactive. A new calcium phosphate layer was observed on the surface of the composite after soaking in SBF for only 1 day while osteoblast cells were able to attach and attain normal morphology on the surface of the composite.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19225870     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-009-3697-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  15 in total

Review 1.  Solid freeform fabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds for engineering replacement tissues and organs.

Authors:  K F Leong; C M Cheah; C K Chua
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Strength improvement of critical-sized three dimensional printing parts by infiltration of solvent-free visible light-cured resin.

Authors:  J Suwanprateeb
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?

Authors:  Tadashi Kokubo; Hiroaki Takadama
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Porous ceramic bone scaffolds for vascularized bone tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Julia Will; Reinhold Melcher; Cornelia Treul; Nahum Travitzky; Ulrich Kneser; Elias Polykandriotis; Raymund Horch; Peter Greil
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Glass reinforced hydroxyapatite for hard tissue surgery--part 1: Mechanical properties.

Authors:  G Georgiou; J C Knowles
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Hydroxyapatite/SiO(2)-CaO-P(2)O(5) glass materials: in vitro bioactivity and biocompatibility.

Authors:  S Padilla; J Román; S Sánchez-Salcedo; M Vallet-Regí
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  Three-dimensional printing of porous ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Hermann Seitz; Wolfgang Rieder; Stephan Irsen; Barbara Leukers; Carsten Tille
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.368

8.  Characterization of bioactive glass-reinforced HAP-polymer composites.

Authors:  Y E Greish; P W Brown
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000-12-15

Review 9.  Novel bioactive materials with different mechanical properties.

Authors:  Tadashi Kokubo; Hyun-Min Kim; Masakazu Kawashita
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Fabrication of bioactive hydroxyapatite/bis-GMA based composite via three dimensional printing.

Authors:  J Suwanprateeb; R Sanngam; W Suwanpreuk
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 3.896

View more
  16 in total

1.  Editorial on the original article entitled "3D printing of composite calcium phosphate and collagen scaffolds for bone regeneration" published in the Biomaterials on February 14, 2014.

Authors:  Lan Li; Qing Jiang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-05

2.  3D Printing of Personalized Artificial Bone Scaffolds.

Authors:  Shailly H Jariwala; Gregory S Lewis; Zachary J Bushman; James H Adair; Henry J Donahue
Journal:  3D Print Addit Manuf       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 5.449

3.  Polymers for 3D Printing and Customized Additive Manufacturing.

Authors:  Samuel Clark Ligon; Robert Liska; Jürgen Stampfl; Matthias Gurr; Rolf Mülhaupt
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-07-30       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Enhancement of mechanical properties of 3D printed hydroxyapatite by combined low and high molecular weight polycaprolactone sequential infiltration.

Authors:  Jintamai Suwanprateeb; Faungchat Thammarakcharoen; Nattapat Hobang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Additive manufacturing of biomaterials.

Authors:  Susmita Bose; Dongxu Ke; Himanshu Sahasrabudhe; Amit Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Prog Mater Sci       Date:  2017-08-26

6.  (Bio)manufactured Solutions for Treatment of Bone Defects with Emphasis on US-FDA Regulatory Science Perspective.

Authors:  Pejman Ghelich; Mehdi Kazemzadeh-Narbat; Alireza Hassani Najafabadi; Mohamadmahdi Samandari; Adnan Memic; Ali Tamayol
Journal:  Adv Nanobiomed Res       Date:  2022-01-05

7.  Three-Dimensional Printing of Bone Extracellular Matrix for Craniofacial Regeneration.

Authors:  Ben P Hung; Bilal A Naved; Ethan L Nyberg; Miguel Dias; Christina A Holmes; Jennifer H Elisseeff; Amir H Dorafshar; Warren L Grayson
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2016-04-18

8.  Low temperature preparation of calcium phosphate structure via phosphorization of 3D-printed calcium sulfate hemihydrate based material.

Authors:  J Suwanprateeb; W Suvannapruk; K Wasoontararat
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 9.  Nanotechnology Treatment Options for Osteoporosis and Its Corresponding Consequences.

Authors:  Donglei Wei; Jinsuh Jung; Huilin Yang; David A Stout; Lei Yang
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 10.  3D-Printing Technologies for Craniofacial Rehabilitation, Reconstruction, and Regeneration.

Authors:  Ethan L Nyberg; Ashley L Farris; Ben P Hung; Miguel Dias; Juan R Garcia; Amir H Dorafshar; Warren L Grayson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.