OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic value of indirect magnetic resonance arthrography (I-MRA) with that of direct MR arthrography (D-MRA) for labral tears, rotator cuff tears, and long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) tears using a 3-T MR unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was given; written informed consent was obtained from all patients. From November 2005 to June 2006, 19 patients (eight men and 11 women; mean age, 51 years) who had undergone both I-MRA and D-MRA underwent arthroscopic surgery. Both methods were performed in fat-saturated axial, coronal oblique, and sagittal oblique T1-weighted sequences, as well as axial and coronal oblique T2-weighted sequences. Two radiologists independently and retrospectively evaluated two sets of MRA for the diagnosis of superior and anterior labral tears, subscapularis tendon (SSC), and supraspinatus-infraspinatus tendon (SSP-ISP) tears, and LHBT tears. With the arthroscopic finding as a gold standard, we analyzed statistical differences of sensitivities and specificities between two sets of MRA and inter-observer agreement was evaluated using the kappa value. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of I-MRA and D-MRA for reader 1 were 79/80% and 71/80%, respectively, for superior labral tears; 100/100% and 100/100%, respectively, for anterior labral tears; 64/75% and 64/100%, respectively, for SSC tears; 100/86% and 100/100%, respectively, for SSP-ISP tears; and 67/100% and 78/100%, respectively, for LHBT tears. Those of I-MRA and D-MRA for reader 2 were 86/80% and 71/100%, respectively, for superior labral tears; 100/83% and 100/100%, respectively, for anterior labral tears; 64/88% and 82/100%, respectively, for SSC tears; 92/86% and 100/100%, respectively, for SSP-ISP tears; and 78/90% and 89/100%, respectively, for LHBT tears. No significant differences were found between the methods. Inter-observer agreements were higher than moderate (kappa > 0.41) with both methods. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a relatively small number of patients, no significant difference was detected between I-MRI and D-MRI with regard rotator cuff, labral, and LHBT tears.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic value of indirect magnetic resonance arthrography (I-MRA) with that of direct MR arthrography (D-MRA) for labral tears, rotator cuff tears, and long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) tears using a 3-T MR unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was given; written informed consent was obtained from all patients. From November 2005 to June 2006, 19 patients (eight men and 11 women; mean age, 51 years) who had undergone both I-MRA and D-MRA underwent arthroscopic surgery. Both methods were performed in fat-saturated axial, coronal oblique, and sagittal oblique T1-weighted sequences, as well as axial and coronal oblique T2-weighted sequences. Two radiologists independently and retrospectively evaluated two sets of MRA for the diagnosis of superior and anterior labral tears, subscapularis tendon (SSC), and supraspinatus-infraspinatus tendon (SSP-ISP) tears, and LHBT tears. With the arthroscopic finding as a gold standard, we analyzed statistical differences of sensitivities and specificities between two sets of MRA and inter-observer agreement was evaluated using the kappa value. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of I-MRA and D-MRA for reader 1 were 79/80% and 71/80%, respectively, for superior labral tears; 100/100% and 100/100%, respectively, for anterior labral tears; 64/75% and 64/100%, respectively, for SSC tears; 100/86% and 100/100%, respectively, for SSP-ISP tears; and 67/100% and 78/100%, respectively, for LHBT tears. Those of I-MRA and D-MRA for reader 2 were 86/80% and 71/100%, respectively, for superior labral tears; 100/83% and 100/100%, respectively, for anterior labral tears; 64/88% and 82/100%, respectively, for SSC tears; 92/86% and 100/100%, respectively, for SSP-ISP tears; and 78/90% and 89/100%, respectively, for LHBT tears. No significant differences were found between the methods. Inter-observer agreements were higher than moderate (kappa > 0.41) with both methods. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a relatively small number of patients, no significant difference was detected between I-MRI and D-MRI with regard rotator cuff, labral, and LHBT tears.
Authors: Simone Waldt; Andreas Burkart; Peter Lange; Andreas B Imhoff; Ernst J Rummeny; Klaus Woertler Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: J M Legan; T K Burkhard; W B Goff; Z N Balsara; A J Martinez; D D Burks; D A Kallman; T J O'Brien; J M Lapoint Journal: Radiology Date: 1991-04 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Douglas P Beall; Eric E Williamson; Justin Q Ly; Mark C Adkins; Robert L Emery; Thomas P Jones; Charles M Rowland Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Keith Meister; Jim Thesing; William J Montgomery; Peter A Indelicato; Steve Walczak; William Fontenot Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2003-09-26 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Eduardo Baptista; Eduardo A Malavolta; Mauro E C Gracitelli; Daniel Alvarenga; Marcelo Bordalo-Rodrigues; Arnaldo A Ferreira Neto; Nestor de Barros Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2019-04-02 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Anthony S Tadros; Brady K Huang; Lucas Wymore; Heinz Hoenecke; Jan Fronek; Eric Y Chang Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Catherine N Petchprapa; Leon D Rybak; Kevin S Dunham; Riccardo Lattanzi; Michael P Recht Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2014-10-03 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Tobias Johannes Dietrich; Beat K Moor; Gabor J Puskas; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Juerg Hodler; Cynthia K Peterson Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-08-29 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Saskia A Schreinemachers; Victor P M van der Hulst; W Jaap Willems; Shandra Bipat; Henk-Jan van der Woude Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2009-03-18 Impact factor: 2.199