Literature DB >> 19225266

Bone mineral density and risk of fractures in aging, obese post-menopausal women with type 2 diabetes. The GIUMO Study.

Manuel Sosa1, Pedro Saavedra, Esteban Jódar, Carlos Lozano-Tonkin, José Manuel Quesada, Antonio Torrijos, Ramón Pérez-Cano, Xavier Nogués, Manuel Díaz-Curiel, Manuel Jesús Moro, Carlos Gómez, José Mosquera, Javier Alegre, José Olmos, Manuel Muñoz-Torres, Nuria Guañabens, Javier Del Pino, Federico Hawkins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) has a high prevalence in aging obese postmenopausal women. It is not clear whether or not diabetes produces an increase in bone mineral density or an increase in fracture rates.
OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to investigate whether type 2 DM produces a higher prevalence of vertebral, hip and non-vertebral fractures in obese postmenopausal Caucasian women. A secondary objective was to study the influence of DM in quantitative ultrasound measurements of the heel (QUS) and bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), in both lumbar spine (L2-L4) and proximal femur.
METHOD: This study was a prospective cohort of 111 patients with type 2 DM and 91 control individuals (CTR) over age 65 and obese, recruited from 16 centers in Spain. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Lateral dorsal and lumbar X-rays were performed to assess vertebral fractures. Hip and non-vertebral fractures were noted from medical records, written reports or Xray studies. QUS measurements were made of the calcaneus and BMD measurements of the lumbar spine (L2-L4) and proximal femur.
RESULTS: Patients had higher BMD in the lumbar spine (L2-L4) than controls (0.979 g/cm2 vs 0.927 g/cm2, p=0.035), but we found no statistically significant differences in the proximal femur. QUS measurements showed similar values in both groups: BUA (69.3 dB/Mhz vs 66.7 dB/Mhz, p=0.291), SOS (1537 m/sg vs 1532 m/sg, p=0.249) and QUI (87.5 vs 83.7, p=0.153). No statistically significant differences were found in any case. There was no association between vertebral, hip and non-vertebral fractures and DM. The crude odds ratio, without adjusting was 1.045 (CI 95% 0.531 ; 2.059), and the adjusted odds ratio was 0.927 (CI 95% 0.461 ; 1.863).
CONCLUSIONS: In obese postmenopausal Caucasian women, type 2 DM produces an increase in BMD of the lumbar spine without changes in BMD of the proximal femur or in QUS measurements of the heel. The prevalence of vertebral, hip and non-vertebral fractures did not increase in type 2 DM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19225266     DOI: 10.1007/bf03324895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 1594-0667            Impact factor:   3.636


  15 in total

Review 1.  Bone health and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review.

Authors:  Erin Gorman; Anna M Chudyk; Kenneth M Madden; Maureen C Ashe
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 2.  A critical review of diabetes, glycemic control, and dental implant therapy.

Authors:  Thomas W Oates; Guy Huynh-Ba; Adriana Vargas; Peggy Alexander; Jocelyne Feine
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Bone quantitative ultrasound measurements in relation to the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus in a cohort of elderly subjects at high risk of cardiovascular disease from the PREDIMED study.

Authors:  M Bulló; M Garcia-Aloy; J Basora; M I Covas; J Salas-Salvado
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.075

4.  Risk of low-energy fracture in type 2 diabetes patients: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  P Jia; L Bao; H Chen; J Yuan; W Liu; F Feng; J Li; H Tang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Diabetes and fractures: an overshadowed association.

Authors:  Natasha B Khazai; George R Beck; Guillermo E Umpierrez
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.243

6.  Vertebral Fractures in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: More Than Skeletal Complications Alone.

Authors:  Fjorda Koromani; Ling Oei; Enisa Shevroja; Katerina Trajanoska; Josje Schoufour; Taulant Muka; Oscar H Franco; M Arfan Ikram; M Carola Zillikens; André G Uitterlinden; Gabriel P Krestin; Tassos Anastassiades; Robert Josse; Stephanie M Kaiser; David Goltzman; Brian C Lentle; Jerilynn C Prior; William D Leslie; Eugene McCloskey; Olivier Lamy; Didier Hans; Edwin H Oei; Fernando Rivadeneira
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  The effects of high fat diet, bone healing, and BMP-2 treatment on endothelial cell growth and function.

Authors:  Fazal Ur Rehman Bhatti; Ushashi C Dadwal; Conner R Valuch; Nikhil P Tewari; Olatundun D Awosanya; Caio de Andrade Staut; Seungyup Sun; Stephen K Mendenhall; Anthony J Perugini; Rohit U Nagaraj; Hanisha L Battina; Murad K Nazzal; Rachel J Blosser; Kevin A Maupin; Paul J Childress; Jiliang Li; Melissa A Kacena
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 8.  The alliance of mesenchymal stem cells, bone, and diabetes.

Authors:  Nicola Napoli; Rocky Strollo; Angela Paladini; Silvia I Briganti; Paolo Pozzilli; Sol Epstein
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.257

9.  Comparison of bone density on the dominant and nondominant sides between healthy elderly individuals and stroke patients.

Authors:  Dong Gi Min; Jae Hong Lee; Han Seong Choe; Eun Jung Kim; So Hong Shin; Jin Hwan Lee
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-09-29

Review 10.  Fracture Risk in Type 2 Diabetes: Current Perspectives and Gender Differences.

Authors:  Giuseppina T Russo; Annalisa Giandalia; Elisabetta L Romeo; Morabito Nunziata; Marco Muscianisi; Maria Concetta Ruffo; Antonino Catalano; Domenico Cucinotta
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2016-12-04       Impact factor: 3.257

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.