PURPOSE: Both bevacizumab and sunitinib target the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway and demonstrate activity against advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In this phase I study, the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and safety of sunitinib in combination with bevacizumab were examined in patients with advanced RCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three cohorts of three to six patients were treated with escalated doses of daily oral sunitinib (ie, 25 mg, 37.5 mg, 50 mg) for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week break and with fixed doses of bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) intravenously once every 2 weeks. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed during the first cycle to determine the MTD, and an expanded cohort was treated to obtain additional safety information. RESULTS: Of 26 study participants, 25 received treatment at one of three dose levels. Grade 4 hemorrhage, identified as a DLT, occurred in one patient in each of cohorts 2 and 3. The MTD was determined to be sunitinib 50 mg/bevacizumab 10 mg/kg, but chronic therapy at this dose level frequently resulted in grades 3 to 4 hypertension and hematologic and vascular toxicities. Overall, 48% of patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. One complete and 12 partial responses were observed, which provided an objective response rate of 52%. CONCLUSION: In this phase I trial of patients with metastatic RCC, the combination of sunitinib and bevacizumab caused a high degree of hypertension and vascular and hematologic toxicities at the highest dose level. We do not plan to pursue additional study of this regimen at these doses in patients with RCC.
PURPOSE: Both bevacizumab and sunitinib target the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway and demonstrate activity against advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In this phase I study, the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and safety of sunitinib in combination with bevacizumab were examined in patients with advanced RCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three cohorts of three to six patients were treated with escalated doses of daily oral sunitinib (ie, 25 mg, 37.5 mg, 50 mg) for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week break and with fixed doses of bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) intravenously once every 2 weeks. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed during the first cycle to determine the MTD, and an expanded cohort was treated to obtain additional safety information. RESULTS: Of 26 study participants, 25 received treatment at one of three dose levels. Grade 4 hemorrhage, identified as a DLT, occurred in one patient in each of cohorts 2 and 3. The MTD was determined to be sunitinib 50 mg/bevacizumab 10 mg/kg, but chronic therapy at this dose level frequently resulted in grades 3 to 4 hypertension and hematologic and vascular toxicities. Overall, 48% of patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. One complete and 12 partial responses were observed, which provided an objective response rate of 52%. CONCLUSION: In this phase I trial of patients with metastatic RCC, the combination of sunitinib and bevacizumab caused a high degree of hypertension and vascular and hematologic toxicities at the highest dose level. We do not plan to pursue additional study of this regimen at these doses in patients with RCC.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Brian I Rini; Ronald M Bukowski; Brendan D Curti; Daniel J George; Gary R Hudes; Bruce G Redman; Kim A Margolin; Jaime R Merchan; George Wilding; Michelle S Ginsberg; Jennifer Bacik; Sindy T Kim; Charles M Baum; M Dror Michaelson Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-06-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Carlos Frangié; Carmen Lefaucheur; Jacques Medioni; Christian Jacquot; Garry S Hill; Dominique Nochy Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Thomas E Hutson; Piotr Tomczak; M Dror Michaelson; Ronald M Bukowski; Olivier Rixe; Stéphane Oudard; Sylvie Negrier; Cezary Szczylik; Sindy T Kim; Isan Chen; Paul W Bycott; Charles M Baum; Robert A Figlin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-01-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Richard J Levine; Chun Lam; Cong Qian; Kai F Yu; Sharon E Maynard; Benjamin P Sachs; Baha M Sibai; Franklin H Epstein; Roberto Romero; Ravi Thadhani; S Ananth Karumanchi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-09-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sharon E Maynard; Jiang-Yong Min; Jaime Merchan; Kee-Hak Lim; Jianyi Li; Susanta Mondal; Towia A Libermann; James P Morgan; Frank W Sellke; Isaac E Stillman; Franklin H Epstein; Vikas P Sukhatme; S Ananth Karumanchi Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Luigi Schips; Orietta Dalpiaz; Katja Lipsky; Cord Langner; Peter Rehak; Peter Puerstner; Karl Pummer; Richard Zigeuner Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2006-07-05 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Gerald S Falchook; Jennifer J Wheler; Aung Naing; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Siqing Fu; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; David S Hong; Filip Janku; Ralph Zinner; Yunfang Jiang; Mei Huang; Quan Lin; Kristin Parkhurst; Razelle Kurzrock Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2014-11-04 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Shivanni Kummar; Helen X Chen; John Wright; Susan Holbeck; Myrtle Davis Millin; Joseph Tomaszewski; James Zweibel; Jerry Collins; James H Doroshow Journal: Nat Rev Drug Discov Date: 2010-10-29 Impact factor: 84.694
Authors: Brian I Rini; Jorge A Garcia; Matthew M Cooney; Paul Elson; Allison Tyler; Kristi Beatty; Joseph Bokar; Tarek Mekhail; R M Bukowski; G Thomas Budd; Pierre Triozzi; Ernest Borden; Percy Ivy; Helen X Chen; Afshin Dolwati; Robert Dreicer Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-09-22 Impact factor: 12.531