Literature DB >> 19224790

Manual versus target-controlled infusion remifentanil administration in spontaneously breathing patients.

Annelies T Moerman1, Luc L Herregods, Martine M De Vos, Eric P Mortier, Michel M R F Struys.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The combination of propofol-remifentanil for procedural deep sedation in spontaneously breathing patients is characterized by the frequent incidence of side effects, especially respiratory depression. These side effects may be due to either the drug combination or the drug delivery technique. Target-controlled infusion (TCI) might optimize drug delivery. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy, we thus tried to answer two questions: first, if adding remifentanil to propofol surpasses the disadvantages of the combination of these two products, and second, if administration of remifentanil via TCI decreases the incidence of side effects, compared to manually controlled administration.
METHODS: Patients undergoing elective colonoscopy were randomly assigned to receive remifentanil via manually controlled continuous infusion (MCI) (0.125 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) for 2 min followed by a continuous infusion of 0.05 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)), TCI remifentanil (1 ng/mL), or placebo (normal saline either as TCI or manual infusion of equivalent rate). All patients received TCI propofol, adjusted to a target concentration level that provided deep sedation in which patients were not responsive to verbal commands, but maintained spontaneous ventilation without assistance.
RESULTS: Significantly more patients in the placebo group showed movement, cough and hiccup, which transiently interfered with the examination. There were no clinically significant differences in hemodynamic or recovery variables among all groups. Remifentanil administered via TCI resulted in a decrease in propofol requirements. The incidence of hypopnea and apnea was less frequent when remifentanil was administered via TCI compared to MCI (TCI n = 7, MCI n = 16, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The combination of remifentanil and propofol for deep sedation in spontaneously breathing patients, offered better conditions for colonoscopy than propofol used as a single drug. Remifentanil administered via TCI resulted in a decrease in propofol dosing and in a lower incidence in apnea and respiratory depression (TCI n = 7, MCI n = 16, P < 0.05), compared to manually controlled administration of remifentanil.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19224790     DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318198f6dc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  19 in total

1.  Sedation and analgesia in gastrointestinal endoscopy: what's new?

Authors:  Lorella Fanti; Pier-Alberto Testoni
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  [Target-controlled infusion. Clinical relevance and special features when using pharmacokinetic models].

Authors:  H Ihmsen; S Schraag; S Kreuer; J Bruhn; S Albrecht
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  The utility of bispectral index monitoring for sedated patients treated with low-dose remifentanil.

Authors:  Takao Kato; Toshiya Koitabashi; Takashi Ouchi; Ryohei Serita
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Dental treatment in patients with severe gag reflex using propofol-remifentanil intravenous sedation.

Authors:  Sooil Shin; Seungoh Kim
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2017-03-27

5.  Target controlled remifentanil infusion for smooth laryngeal mask airway removal during emergence from desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia.

Authors:  Derya Ozkan; Julide Ergil; Alp Alptekin; Nihan Aktürk; Haluk Gümüs
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  The questionable efficacy of topical pharyngeal anesthesia in combination with propofol sedation in gastroscopy.

Authors:  Hsin-I Tsai; Yung-Fung Tsai; Shiue-Chin Liou; Ming-Yao Su; Chih-Chung Lin; Chee-Jen Chang; Huang-Ping Yu
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-05-06       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  A comparison of three different target-controlled remifentanil infusion rates during target-controlled propofol infusion for oocyte retrieval.

Authors:  Demet Coskun; Berrin Gunaydin; Ayca Tas; Gozde Inan; Hulya Celebi; Kadir Kaya
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  A target-controlled infusion system with bispectral index monitoring of propofol sedation during endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Atsushi Imagawa; Hidenori Hata; Morihito Nakatsu; Akihiro Matsumi; Eijiro Ueta; Kozue Suto; Hiroyuki Terasawa; Hiroyuki Sakae; Keiko Takeuchi; Manabu Fujihara; Hitomi Endo; Hisae Yasuhara; Shinichi Ishihara; Hiromitsu Kanzaki; Hideki Jinno; Hidenori Kamada; Eisuke Kaji; Akio Moriya; Masaharu Ando
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2014-11-17

9.  Review of the efficacy and safety of remifentanil for the prevention and treatment of pain during and after procedures and surgery.

Authors:  Erica L Sivak; Peter J Davis
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2010-07-15

Review 10.  Medical devices for the anesthetist: current perspectives.

Authors:  Jerry Ingrande; Hendrikus Jm Lemmens
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.