Literature DB >> 19224527

Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the 'angle of progression' predict the mode of delivery?

K D Kalache1, A M Dückelmann, S A M Michaelis, J Lange, G Cichon, J W Dudenhausen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the angle of progression on transperineal ultrasound imaging between different modes of delivery in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior fetal position.
METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 41 women at term (>or= 37 weeks) with failure to progress in the second stage of labor. Only cases with occipitoanterior fetal position were included in the final analysis. These cases were classified into three groups: Cesarean section for failure to progress, vacuum extraction for failure to progress, and spontaneous delivery following prolonged second stage of labor. Transperineal ultrasound examination was performed just before digital examination and subsequent delivery. The angle between a line placed through the midline of the pubic symphysis and a line running from the inferior apex of the symphysis tangentially to the fetal skull (the so-called 'angle of progression') was measured offline by an observer blinded to the mode of delivery.
RESULTS: There were 26 cases with occipitoanterior fetal position (Cesarean section, n = 5; vacuum extraction, n = 16; spontaneous delivery, n = 5). Logistic regression analysis showed a strong relationship between the angle of progression and the need for Cesarean delivery (R(2) measure of fit = 55%, likelihood ratio chi-square P < 0.0001). When the angle of progression was 120 degrees , the fitted probability of either an easy and successful vacuum extraction or spontaneous vaginal delivery was 90%.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report to document a strong relationship between an objective ultrasound marker (angle of progression) and the mode of delivery following prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior fetal position. A predictive model using this parameter would allow better decision making regarding operative delivery for obstructed labor. (c) 2009 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19224527     DOI: 10.1002/uog.6294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  18 in total

1.  Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound for evaluating uterine contraction intensity in the second stage of labor.

Authors:  Miyuki Muramoto; Kiyotake Ichizuka; Junichi Hasegawa; Masamitsu Nakamura; Satoshi Dohi; Hiroshi Saito; Masaaki Nagatsuka
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 1.314

2.  Dynamic Changes in the Myometrium during the Third Stage of Labor, Evaluated Using Two-Dimensional Ultrasound, in Women with Normal and Abnormal Third Stage of Labor and in Women with Obstetric Complications.

Authors:  Manasi Patwardhan; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Hyunyoung Ahn; Steven J Korzeniewski; Alyse Schwartz; Sonia S Hassan; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 3.  Intrapartum sonographic assessment of labor.

Authors:  Uri Erlik; Igal Wolman
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2013-10-09

4.  Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery by transperineal ultrasound performed just after full cervical dilatation is determined.

Authors:  Saeko Kameyama; Akira Sato; Hiroshi Miura; Jin Kumagai; Naoki Sato; Dai Shimizu; Kenichi Makino; Yukihiro Terada
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 1.314

5.  Ultrasonographic evaluation of the second stage of labor. Predictive parameters for a successful vaginal delivery with or without neuraxial analgesia: a pilot study.

Authors:  Caterina Pizzicaroli; Carlotta Montagnoli; Ilaria Simonelli; Maria Grazia Frigo; Herbert Valensise; Mario Filippo Segatore; Giovanni Larciprete
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2018-02-28

6.  Intrapartum ultrasound use in clinical practice as a predictor of delivery mode during prolonged second stage of labor.

Authors:  Edi Vaisbuch; Roni Levy; Tamar Katzir; Yoav Brezinov; Ella Khairish; Shira Hadad
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  Overweight and Obesity before, during and after Pregnancy: Part 2: Evidence-based Risk Factors and Interventions.

Authors:  B Arabin; J H Stupin
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.915

8.  Sonographic evaluation in the second stage of labor to improve the assessment of labor progress and its outcome.

Authors:  Lami Yeo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 7.299

9.  Measurement of Angle of Descent (AOD) by Transperineal Ultrasound in Labour to Predict Successful Vaginal Delivery.

Authors:  Renuka Malik; Swati Singh
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2020-01-02

10.  Using transperineal ultrasound to predict labor onset.

Authors:  Fanghua Peng; Yang Yu; Yanan Sun; Shan Jiang; Yun Han; Zhikun Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.