| Literature DB >> 19224302 |
Khalid Azzam1, Kevin McHale, Matthew Austin, James J Purtill, Javad Parvizi.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Recurrent or persistent infection after two-stage exchange arthroplasty for previously infected total knee replacement is a challenging clinical situation. We asked whether a second two-stage procedure could eradicate the infection and preserve knee function. We evaluated 18 selected patients with failed two-stage total knee arthroplasty implantation treated with a second two-stage reimplantation between 1999 and 2005. Failure of treatment was defined as recurrence or persistence of infection. The minimum followup was 24 months (mean, 40 months; range, 24-83 months). Recurrent or persistent infection was diagnosed in four of 18 patients, two of whom were successfully treated with a third two-stage exchange arthroplasty. Knee Society score questionnaires administered at the last followup showed an average Knee Society knee score of 73 points (range, 24-100 points) and an average functional score of 49 points (range, 20-90 points). The data suggest repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty is a reasonable option for eradicating periprosthetic infection, relieving pain, and achieving a satisfactory level of function for some patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19224302 PMCID: PMC2690747 DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-0739-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res ISSN: 0009-921X Impact factor: 4.176