PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate whether Fas-associated death domain interleukin-1 converting enzyme like inhibitory protein (FLIP) inhibition is a therapeutic target associated with 2-methoxyestradiol (2-ME2)-mediated tumor regression. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Expression and levels of FLIP were analyzed using (a) real-time PCR and immunoblot analysis in androgen-independent PC-3 cells treated with the newly formulated 2-ME2 and (b) immunohistochemistry in different Gleason pattern human prostate tumors. Transient transfections and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays were used to identify the transcription factors that regulate FLIP. Involvement of FLIP in 2-ME2-induced tumor regression was evaluated in transgenic adenocarcinoma mouse prostate (TRAMP) mice. RESULTS: High Gleason pattern (5+5) human prostate tumors exhibit significant increase in FLIP compared with low Gleason pattern 3+3 (P=or<0.04). 2-ME2 reduced the levels and promoter activity of FLIP (P=0.001) in PC-3 cells. Transient expression assays show sequences between -503/+242 being sufficient for 2-ME2-induced inhibition of FLIP promoter activity. Cotransfection experiments show that overexpression of Sp1 activated, whereas Sp3 inhibited, Sp1 transactivation of FLIP promoter activity (P=0.0001). 2-ME2 treatment reduced binding of Sp1 to the FLIP promoter as evidenced by ChIP. Further, levels of FLIP associated with Fas or FADD decreased, whereas cleavage of caspase-8, levels of Bid, and apoptosis increased in response to 2-ME2 treatment in PC-3 cells. Administration of 2-ME2 regressed established prostate tumors in TRAMP mice that were associated with reduced expression of FLIP and Sp1. CONCLUSION: Targeting Sp1-mediated FLIP signaling pathway may provide a novel approach for prostate cancer management.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate whether Fas-associated death domain interleukin-1 converting enzyme like inhibitory protein (FLIP) inhibition is a therapeutic target associated with 2-methoxyestradiol (2-ME2)-mediated tumor regression. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Expression and levels of FLIP were analyzed using (a) real-time PCR and immunoblot analysis in androgen-independent PC-3 cells treated with the newly formulated 2-ME2 and (b) immunohistochemistry in different Gleason pattern humanprostate tumors. Transient transfections and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays were used to identify the transcription factors that regulate FLIP. Involvement of FLIP in 2-ME2-induced tumor regression was evaluated in transgenic adenocarcinomamouse prostate (TRAMP) mice. RESULTS: High Gleason pattern (5+5) humanprostate tumors exhibit significant increase in FLIP compared with low Gleason pattern 3+3 (P=or<0.04). 2-ME2 reduced the levels and promoter activity of FLIP (P=0.001) in PC-3 cells. Transient expression assays show sequences between -503/+242 being sufficient for 2-ME2-induced inhibition of FLIP promoter activity. Cotransfection experiments show that overexpression of Sp1 activated, whereas Sp3 inhibited, Sp1 transactivation of FLIP promoter activity (P=0.0001). 2-ME2 treatment reduced binding of Sp1 to the FLIP promoter as evidenced by ChIP. Further, levels of FLIP associated with Fas or FADD decreased, whereas cleavage of caspase-8, levels of Bid, and apoptosis increased in response to 2-ME2 treatment in PC-3 cells. Administration of 2-ME2 regressed established prostate tumors in TRAMPmice that were associated with reduced expression of FLIP and Sp1. CONCLUSION: Targeting Sp1-mediated FLIP signaling pathway may provide a novel approach for prostate cancer management.
Authors: H Ishibashi; K Nakagawa; M Onimaru; E J Castellanous; Y Kaneda; Y Nakashima; K Shirasuna; K Sueishi Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2000-11-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: T Fukazawa; T Fujiwara; F Uno; F Teraishi; Y Kadowaki; T Itoshima; Y Takata; S Kagawa; J A Roth; J Tschopp; N Tanaka Journal: Oncogene Date: 2001-08-23 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: R R Bullani; B Huard; I Viard-Leveugle; H R Byers; M Irmler; J H Saurat; J Tschopp; L E French Journal: J Invest Dermatol Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 8.551
Authors: Roman Kurt Thomas; Anne Kallenborn; Claudia Wickenhauser; Joachim Ludwig Schultze; Andreas Draube; Martina Vockerodt; Daniel Re; Volker Diehl; Jürgen Wolf Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Sug Hyung Lee; Hong Sug Kim; Su Young Kim; Yun-Sil Lee; Won Sang Park; Sang Ho Kim; Jung Young Lee; Nam Jin Yoo Journal: APMIS Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 3.205
Authors: V Matys; E Fricke; R Geffers; E Gössling; M Haubrock; R Hehl; K Hornischer; D Karas; A E Kel; O V Kel-Margoulis; D-U Kloos; S Land; B Lewicki-Potapov; H Michael; R Münch; I Reuter; S Rotert; H Saxel; M Scheer; S Thiele; E Wingender Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2003-01-01 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Roble G Bedolla; Dimpy P Shah; Shih-Bo Huang; Robert L Reddick; Rita Ghosh; Addanki P Kumar Journal: Mol Carcinog Date: 2019-03-11 Impact factor: 4.784
Authors: Jingjing Gong; Jianping Xie; Roble Bedolla; Paul Rivas; Divya Chakravarthy; James W Freeman; Robert Reddick; Scott Kopetz; Amanda Peterson; Huamin Wang; Susan M Fischer; Addanki P Kumar Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-02-11 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Guiming Li; Paul Rivas; Roble Bedolla; Dinesh Thapa; Robert L Reddick; Rita Ghosh; Addanki P Kumar Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2012-12-17
Authors: Roble G Bedolla; Jingjing Gong; Thomas J Prihoda; I-Tien Yeh; Ian M Thompson; Rita Ghosh; Addanki P Kumar Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dinesh Thapa; Peng Meng; Roble G Bedolla; Robert L Reddick; Addanki P Kumar; Rita Ghosh Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2014-08-14 Impact factor: 12.701