UNLABELLED: To optimize in vivo tissue uptake kinetics and clearance of engineered monoclonal antibody (mAb) fragments for radiotherapeutic and radiodiagnostic applications, we compared the biodistribution and tumor localization of four (111)In- and (86)Y-labeled antibody formats, derived from a single antimindin/RG-1 mAb, in a prostate tumor model. The IgG, diabody, single-chain variable domain (scFv), and novel miniantibody formats, composed of the human IgE-C(H)4 and a modified IgG1 hinge linked to scFv domains, were compared. METHODS: Antibodies were first derivatized with the bifunctional chelator CHX-A''-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid and then bound to the radiometal to create radiolabeled immunoconjugates. Human LNCaP xenografts were grown in nude mice, and (111)In- or (86)Y-labeled antibodies were administered intravenously. Tissues were harvested at different times, and the level of antibody deposition was determined by measuring radioactivity. Whole-body small-animal PET of mice receiving (86)Y-labeled antibodies was performed at 6 time points and colocalized with simultaneous micro-CT imaging. RESULTS: The biodistributions of (111)In and (86)Y antibodies were quite similar. The blood, tumor, kidney, and liver tissues contained varying levels of radioactivity. The antibody accumulation in the tumor correlated with molecular size. The IgG steadily increased with time to 24.1 percentage injected dose per gram (%ID/g) at 48 h. The miniantibody accumulated at a similar rate to reach a lower level (14.2 %ID/g) at 48 h but with a higher tumor-to-blood ratio than the IgG. Tumor accumulation of the diabody peaked at 3 h, reaching a much lower level (3.7 %ID/g). A combination of rapid clearance and lower relative affinity of the scFv precluded deposition in the tumor. Small-animal PET results correlated well with the biodistribution results, with similar tumor localization patterns. CONCLUSION: The larger antibody formats (IgG and miniantibody) gave higher tumor uptake levels than did the smaller formats (diabody and scFv). These larger formats may be more suitable for radioimmunotherapy applications, evidenced by the preclinical efficacy previously shown by a report on the IgG format. The smaller formats were rapidly cleared from circulation, and the diabody, which accumulated in the tumor, may be more suitable for radiodiagnostic applications.
UNLABELLED: To optimize in vivo tissue uptake kinetics and clearance of engineered monoclonal antibody (mAb) fragments for radiotherapeutic and radiodiagnostic applications, we compared the biodistribution and tumor localization of four (111)In- and (86)Y-labeled antibody formats, derived from a single antimindin/RG-1 mAb, in a prostate tumor model. The IgG, diabody, single-chain variable domain (scFv), and novel miniantibody formats, composed of the human IgE-C(H)4 and a modified IgG1 hinge linked to scFv domains, were compared. METHODS: Antibodies were first derivatized with the bifunctional chelator CHX-A''-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid and then bound to the radiometal to create radiolabeled immunoconjugates. HumanLNCaP xenografts were grown in nude mice, and (111)In- or (86)Y-labeled antibodies were administered intravenously. Tissues were harvested at different times, and the level of antibody deposition was determined by measuring radioactivity. Whole-body small-animal PET of mice receiving (86)Y-labeled antibodies was performed at 6 time points and colocalized with simultaneous micro-CT imaging. RESULTS: The biodistributions of (111)In and (86)Y antibodies were quite similar. The blood, tumor, kidney, and liver tissues contained varying levels of radioactivity. The antibody accumulation in the tumor correlated with molecular size. The IgG steadily increased with time to 24.1 percentage injected dose per gram (%ID/g) at 48 h. The miniantibody accumulated at a similar rate to reach a lower level (14.2 %ID/g) at 48 h but with a higher tumor-to-blood ratio than the IgG. Tumor accumulation of the diabody peaked at 3 h, reaching a much lower level (3.7 %ID/g). A combination of rapid clearance and lower relative affinity of the scFv precluded deposition in the tumor. Small-animal PET results correlated well with the biodistribution results, with similar tumor localization patterns. CONCLUSION: The larger antibody formats (IgG and miniantibody) gave higher tumor uptake levels than did the smaller formats (diabody and scFv). These larger formats may be more suitable for radioimmunotherapy applications, evidenced by the preclinical efficacy previously shown by a report on the IgG format. The smaller formats were rapidly cleared from circulation, and the diabody, which accumulated in the tumor, may be more suitable for radiodiagnostic applications.
Authors: Yuan-Chuan Tai; Ananya Ruangma; Douglas Rowland; Stefan Siegel; Danny F Newport; Patrick L Chow; Richard Laforest Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Wei Xia; Peter Bringmann; John McClary; Patrick P Jones; Warren Manzana; Ying Zhu; Soujuan Wang; Yi Liu; Susan Harvey; Mary Rose Madlansacay; Kirk McLean; Mary P Rosser; Jean MacRobbie; Catherine L Olsen; Ronald R Cobb Journal: Protein Expr Purif Date: 2005-08-09 Impact factor: 1.650
Authors: S Hu; L Shively; A Raubitschek; M Sherman; L E Williams; J Y Wong; J E Shively; A M Wu Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1996-07-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Stefka B Petkova; Shreeram Akilesh; Thomas J Sproule; Gregory J Christianson; Hana Al Khabbaz; Aaron C Brown; Leonard G Presta; Y Gloria Meng; Derry C Roopenian Journal: Int Immunol Date: 2006-10-31 Impact factor: 4.823
Authors: Laura Borsi; Enrica Balza; Marco Bestagno; Patrizia Castellani; Barbara Carnemolla; Attila Biro; Alessandra Leprini; Jorge Sepulveda; Oscar Burrone; Dario Neri; Luciano Zardi Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2002-11-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Kelly Davis Orcutt; Margaret E Ackerman; Maryelise Cieslewicz; Emmanuel Quiroz; Adrian L Slusarczyk; John V Frangioni; K Dane Wittrup Journal: Protein Eng Des Sel Date: 2009-12-17 Impact factor: 1.650
Authors: Stephan Walrand; Glenn D Flux; Mark W Konijnenberg; Roelf Valkema; Eric P Krenning; Renaud Lhommel; Stanislas Pauwels; Francois Jamar Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-03-11 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Eric W Price; Kimberly J Edwards; Kathryn E Carnazza; Sean D Carlin; Brian M Zeglis; Michael J Adam; Chris Orvig; Jason S Lewis Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2016-06-28 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Richard Tavaré; Wei H Wu; Kirstin A Zettlitz; Felix B Salazar; Katelyn E McCabe; James D Marks; Anna M Wu Journal: Protein Eng Des Sel Date: 2014-08-04 Impact factor: 1.650
Authors: Sai Kiran Sharma; Melinda Wuest; Jenilee D Way; Vincent R Bouvet; Monica Wang; Frank R Wuest Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-07-06