Literature DB >> 19222811

Bounded ethicality: the perils of loss framing.

Mary C Kern1, Dolly Chugh.   

Abstract

Ethical decision making is vulnerable to the forces of automaticity. People behave differently in the face of a potential loss versus a potential gain, even when the two situations are transparently identical. Across three experiments, decision makers engaged in more unethical behavior if a decision was presented in a loss frame than if the decision was presented in a gain frame. In Experiment 1, participants in the loss-frame condition were more likely to favor gathering "insider information" than were participants in the gain-frame condition. In Experiment 2, negotiators in the loss-frame condition lied more than negotiators in the gain-frame condition. In Experiment 3, the tendency to be less ethical in the loss-frame condition occurred under time pressure and was eliminated through the removal of time pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19222811     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02296.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  10 in total

1.  Patterns of neural activity associated with honest and dishonest moral decisions.

Authors:  Joshua D Greene; Joseph M Paxton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Fraud and Understanding the Moral Mind: Need for Implementation of Organizational Characteristics into Behavioral Ethics.

Authors:  Petr Houdek
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  How do people value life?

Authors:  Meng Li; Jeffrey Vietri; Alison P Galvani; Gretchen B Chapman
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-12-22

4.  Cognitive load promotes honesty.

Authors:  Moritz Reis; Roland Pfister; Anna Foerster
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-06-01

5.  Repeating the past: prevention focus motivates repetition, even for unethical decisions.

Authors:  Shu Zhang; James F M Cornwell; E Tory Higgins
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-11-25

6.  Automatic honesty forgoing reward acquisition and punishment avoidance: a functional MRI investigation.

Authors:  Mei Yoneda; Ryuhei Ueda; Hiroshi Ashida; Nobuhito Abe
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Transparency ethics in practice: Revisiting financial conflicts of interest disclosure forms in clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Yidan Lu; Derek J Jones; Nour Sharara; Tonya Kaltenbach; Loren Laine; Kenneth McQuaid; Roy Soetikno; Venkataraman Subramanian; Alan Barkun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Emotional intelligence buffers the effect of physiological arousal on dishonesty.

Authors:  Andrea Pittarello; Beatrice Conte; Marta Caserotti; Sara Scrimin; Enrico Rubaltelli
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

9.  Electrophysiological Mechanisms Underlying Time-Dependent Assessments in Moral Decision-Making.

Authors:  Jin Ho Yun; Jing Zhang; Eun-Ju Lee
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Social-cognitive barriers to ethical authorship.

Authors:  Jordan R Schoenherr
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.