Literature DB >> 19222610

Lipid-altering efficacy of ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg compared with rosuvastatin 10 mg in high-risk hypercholesterolaemic patients inadequately controlled with prior statin monotherapy - The IN-CROSS study.

M Farnier1, M Averna, L Missault, H Vaverkova, M Viigimaa, R Massaad, K Vandormael, A O Johnson-Levonas, P Brudi.   

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of switching from a previous statin monotherapy to ezetimibe/simvastatin (EZE/SIMVA) 10/20 mg vs. rosuvastatin (ROSUVA) 10 mg.
METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind study, 618 patients with documented hypercholesterolaemia [low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) > or = 2.59 and < or = 4.92 mmol/l] and with high cardiovascular risk who were taking a stable daily dose of one of several statin medications for > or = 6 weeks prior to the study randomisation visit entered a 6-week open-label stabilisation/screening period during which they continued to receive their prestudy statin dose. Following stratification by study site and statin dose/potency, patients were randomised to EZE/SIMVA 10/20 mg (n = 314) or ROSUVA 10 mg (n = 304) for 6 weeks.
RESULTS: EZE/SIMVA produced greater reductions in LDL-C (-27.7% vs. -16.9%; p < or = 0.001), total cholesterol (-17.5% vs. -10.3%; p < or = 0.001), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (-23.4% vs. -14.0%; p < or = 0.001) and apolipoprotein B (-17.9% vs. -9.8%; p < or = 0.001) compared with ROSUVA, while both treatments were equally effective at increasing HDL-C (2.1% vs. 3.0%; p = 0.433). More patients achieved LDL-C levels < 2.59 mmol/l (73% vs. 56%), < 2.00 mmol/l (38% vs. 19%) and < 1.81 mmol/l (25% vs. 11%) with EZE/SIMVA than ROSUVA (p < or = 0.001). A borderline significantly greater reduction in triglycerides (p = 0.056) was observed for EZE/SIMVA (-11.0%) vs. ROSUVA (-5.3%). There were no between-group differences in the incidences of adverse events or liver transaminase and creatine kinase elevations.
CONCLUSION: EZE/SIMVA 10/20 mg produced greater improvements in LDL-C, total cholesterol, non-HDL-C and apoB with a similar safety profile as for ROSUVA 10 mg.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19222610     DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02022.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pract        ISSN: 1368-5031            Impact factor:   2.503


  14 in total

Review 1.  Progress and perspectives in plant sterol and plant stanol research.

Authors:  Peter J H Jones; Maryam Shamloo; Dylan S MacKay; Todd C Rideout; Semone B Myrie; Jogchum Plat; Jean-Baptiste Roullet; David J Baer; Kara L Calkins; Harry R Davis; P Barton Duell; Henry Ginsberg; Helena Gylling; David Jenkins; Dieter Lütjohann; Mohammad Moghadasian; Robert A Moreau; David Mymin; Richard E Ostlund; Rouyanne T Ras; Javier Ochoa Reparaz; Elke A Trautwein; Stephen Turley; Tim Vanmierlo; Oliver Weingärtner
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 7.110

2.  Economic evaluation of ezetimibe combined with simvastatin for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia.

Authors:  F van Nooten; G M Davies; J W Jukema; A H Liem; E Yap; X H Hu
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  Ezetimibe + simvastatin versus doubling the dose of simvastatin in high cardiovascular risk diabetics: a multicenter, randomized trial (the LEAD study).

Authors:  Gianluca Bardini; Carlo B Giorda; Antonio E Pontiroli; Cristina Le Grazie; Carlo M Rotella
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 9.951

4.  Ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg versus rosuvastatin 10 mg in high-risk hypercholesterolemic patients stratified by prior statin treatment potency.

Authors:  Margus Viigimaa; Helena Vaverkova; Michel Farnier; Maurizio Averna; Luc Missault; Mary E Hanson; Qian Dong; Arvind Shah; Philippe Brudi
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.876

5.  Ezetimibe/simvastatin vs simvastatin in coronary heart disease patients with or without diabetes.

Authors:  Carlo M Rotella; Augusto Zaninelli; Cristina Le Grazie; Mary E Hanson; Gian Franco Gensini
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 3.876

6.  Meta-Analysis of Intensive Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Patients With Polyvascular Disease.

Authors:  Mohammad Alkhalil; Michał Kuzemczak; Nicholas Whitehead; Charalampos Kavvouras; Vladimír Džavík
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Efficacy, safety and tolerability of ongoing statin plus ezetimibe versus doubling the ongoing statin dose in hypercholesterolemic Taiwanese patients: an open-label, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Chih-Chieh Yu; Wen-Ter Lai; Kuang-Chung Shih; Tsung-Hsien Lin; Chieh-Hua Lu; Hung-Jen Lai; Mary E Hanson; Juey-Jen Hwang
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-05-23

8.  Response by sex to statin plus ezetimibe or statin monotherapy: a pooled analysis of 22,231 hyperlipidemic patients.

Authors:  Beth L Abramson; Pascale Benlian; Mary E Hanson; Jianxin Lin; Arvind Shah; Andrew M Tershakovec
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  Effectiveness of Ezetimibe in Reducing the Estimated Risk for Fatal Cardiovascular Events in Hypercholesterolaemic Patients with Inadequate Lipid Control While on Statin Monotherapy as Measured by the SCORE Model.

Authors:  John S Sampalis; Stéphane Bissonnette; Stella Boukas
Journal:  Adv Prev Med       Date:  2010-10-31

10.  Effectiveness and tolerability of ezetimibe co-administered with statins versus statin dose-doubling in high-risk patients with persistent hyperlipidemia: The EZE(STAT)2 trial.

Authors:  A Shekhar Pandey; Stéphane Bissonnette; Stella Boukas; Emmanouil Rampakakis; John S Sampalis
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.