Literature DB >> 19222443

Diagnostic self-testing: autonomous choices and relational responsibilities.

Alan J Kearns1, Dónal P O'Mathúna, P Anne Scott.   

Abstract

Diagnostic self-testing devices are being developed for many illnesses, chronic diseases and infections. These will be used in hospitals, at point-of-care facilities and at home. Designed to allow earlier detection of diseases, self-testing diagnostic devices may improve disease prevention, slow the progression of disease and facilitate better treatment outcomes. These devices have the potential to benefit both the individual and society by enabling individuals to take a more proactive role in the maintenance of their health and by helping society improve health and reduce health costs. However, the full implications of future home-based diagnostic technology for individuals and society remain unclear due to their novelty. We argue that the development of diagnostic tools, especially for home use, will heighten a number of ethical challenges. This paper will explore some of the ethical implications of home-based self-testing diagnostic devices for the autonomous and relational dimensions of the person. This will be facilitated by examining the impact of diagnostic devices for individual autonomy, for the delivery of accurate diagnosis and for the personal significance of the information for the user. The latter will be examined using Charles Taylor's view of personhood and his emphasis on human agency and interpretation. While the ethical issues are not necessarily new, the development of home-based self-testing diagnostic devices will make issues regarding autonomy, accuracy of information and personal significance more and more demanding. This will be the case particularly when an individual's autonomous choices come into conflict with the person's relational responsibilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19222443     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00711.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioethics        ISSN: 0269-9702            Impact factor:   1.898


  7 in total

1.  A Practical Example of PoCT Working in the Community.

Authors:  Andrew J Francis; Cameron L Martin
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2010-08

2.  Acceptability and Feasibility of HIV Self-Testing Among Transgender Women in San Francisco: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study.

Authors:  Sheri A Lippman; Lissa Moran; Jae Sevelius; Leslie S Castillo; Angel Ventura; Sarah Treves-Kagan; Susan Buchbinder
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2016-04

3.  Need for an Ethical Framework for Testing for Systemic Diseases in Dental Clinics.

Authors:  Marushka Leanne Silveira; Amit Chattopadhyay
Journal:  Ethics Biol Eng Med       Date:  2011-04-01

4.  Patient autonomy and choice in healthcare: self-testing devices as a case in point.

Authors:  Anna-Marie Greaney; Dónal P O'Mathúna; P Anne Scott
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2012-11

5.  Health Consumer Engagement, Enablement, and Empowerment in Smartphone-Enabled Home-Based Diagnostic Testing for Viral Infections: Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Cynthia LeRouge; Polina Durneva; Victoria Lyon; Matthew Thompson
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.947

6.  Ethical complexities of screening for depression and intimate partner violence (IPV) in intervention studies.

Authors:  Victoria J Palmer; Jane S Yelland; Angela J Taft
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Self-tests for influenza: an empirical ethics investigation.

Authors:  Benedict Rumbold; Clare Wenham; James Wilson
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 2.652

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.