Literature DB >> 19221740

Prognostic significance of stress myocardial gated SPECT among Japanese patients referred for coronary angiography: A study of data from the J-ACCESS database.

Mitsuru Momose1, Kenichi Nakajima, Tsunehiko Nishimura.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The J-ACCESS [Japanese investigation of prognosis based on gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)] study found that quantitative gated myocardial SPECT (QGS) is valuable for predicting the prognosis of Japanese patients with known or suspected ischaemic heart disease. The present study evaluates the incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with QGS among patients referred for coronary angiography (CAG).
METHODS: Among 4,031 Japanese patients registered at 117 hospitals for the J-ACCESS study, we selected 1,011 who underwent CAG within 3 months before or after MPI with QGS. Summed stress, rest and difference scores (SSS, SRS and SDS) were generated from myocardial perfusion images using a 20-segment scoring system. Myocardial ischaemia was judged visually. End-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV) and ejection fraction (EF) were determined by QGS. Numbers of diseased (> 75% stenosis) coronary vessels (CDV) were assessed by CAG. All patients were followed up for 3 years to determine cardiac events (CE) including cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and severe heart failure. Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic ability included age, cardiac risk factors (hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes mellitus and prior myocardial infarction), angiographic findings and the QGS parameters as independent variables.
RESULTS: Cardiac events occurred more frequently with increasing numbers of coronary vessel lesions (p = 0.0016). Cox univariate analysis revealed that diabetes, CDV, SSS, SDS, EDV, ESV and EF were significant predictors (Wald chi(2) = 5.99, 12.9, 8.39, 9.11, 35.5, 42.1 and 31.1, respectively), whereas multivariate analysis selected only ESV and SDS as significant predictors (Wald chi(2) = 36.4, 8.4; p = 0.0038, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: MPI with QGS, especially with gated functional data, has incremental prognostic value in addition to angiographic findings. MPI with QGS findings predominantly contribute to the prediction of prognosis rather than numbers of diseased vessels assessed by CAG. Thus, MPI with QGS is the most useful tool with which to guide decisions regarding therapy even among patients referred for CAG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19221740     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-009-1084-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  15 in total

1.  Prognostic value of poststress left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT in women and men: gender-related differences in normal limits and outcomes.

Authors:  Tali Sharir; Xingping Kang; Guido Germano; Jeroen J Bax; Leslee J Shaw; Heidi Gransar; Ishac Cohen; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Prognostic value of radionuclide angiography in medically treated patients with coronary artery disease. A comparison with clinical and catheterization variables.

Authors:  K L Lee; D B Pryor; K S Pieper; F E Harrell; R M Califf; D B Mark; M A Hlatky; R E Coleman; F R Cobb; R H Jones
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; L J Shaw; H Kiat; I Cohen; J A Cabico; J Friedman; G A Diamond
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-02-17       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Prognostic value of exercise stress technetium-99m-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with normal baseline electrocardiograms.

Authors:  Abdou Elhendy; Arend F L Schinkel; Ron T van Domburg; Jeroen J Bax; Roelf Valkema; Aukje Huurman; Harm H H Feringa; Don Poldermans
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Ischemia during ambulatory monitoring as a prognostic indicator in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  D Mulcahy; S Husain; G Zalos; A Rehman; N P Andrews; W H Schenke; N L Geller; A A Quyyumi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997 Jan 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Surveillance study for creating the national clinical database related to ECG-gated myocardial perfusion SPECT of ischemic heart disease: J-ACCESS study design.

Authors:  Hideo Kusuoka; Shigeyuki Nishimura; Akira Yamashina; Kenichi Nakajima; Tsunehiko Nishimura
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.668

7.  Incremental prognostic power of single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Salvador Borges-Neto; Linda K Shaw; Robert H Tuttle; John H Alexander; William T Smith; Marianna Chambless; R Edward Coleman; Robert A Harrington; Robert M Califf
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Incremental value of prognostic testing in patients with known or suspected ischemic heart disease: a basis for optimal utilization of exercise technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  D S Berman; R Hachamovitch; H Kiat; I Cohen; J A Cabico; F P Wang; J D Friedman; G Germano; K Van Train; G A Diamond
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Independent and incremental prognostic value of exercise single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) thallium imaging in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  A S Iskandrian; S C Chae; J Heo; C D Stanberry; V Wasserleben; V Cave
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Outcome in one-vessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  R M Califf; Y Tomabechi; K L Lee; H Phillips; D B Pryor; F E Harrell; P J Harris; R H Peter; V S Behar; Y Kong; R A Rosati
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Prognosis in the era of comparative effectiveness research: where is nuclear cardiology now and where should it be?

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Fadi G Hage; Daniel S Berman; Rory Hachamovitch; Ami Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Myocardial perfusion GSPECT imaging in patients with myocardial bridging.

Authors:  Rafał Gawor; Jacek Kuśmierek; Anna Płachcińska; Małgorzata Bieńkiewicz; Jarosław Drożdż; Grzegorz Piotrowski; Krzysztof Chiżyński
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 5.952

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.