Literature DB >> 19221368

Compendia and anticancer therapy under Medicare.

Katherine Tillman1, Brijet Burton, Louis B Jacques, Steve E Phurrough.   

Abstract

In 1993, Congress directed the Medicare program to refer to 3 existing published compendia, American Medical Association Drug Evaluations (AMA-DE), United States Pharmacopoeia Drug Information for the Health Professional (USP-DI), and American Hospital Formulary Service Drug Information (AHFS-DI), to identify unlabeled but medically accepted uses of drugs and biologicals in anticancer chemotherapy regimens. Public discussion during the preceding years had centered on whether to designate unlabeled uses of anticancer treatments as experimental and thus outside the scope of Medicare benefits. American Medical Association Drug Evaluations and USP-DI subsequently ceased publication, and the Medicare program faced increasing calls to revise the list of acceptable compendia, as authorized in the statute. In 2007, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services used its regulatory authority to establish a publicly transparent process to revise the list. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services considered 5 requests in 2008 and added National Comprehensive Cancer Network Drugs and Biologics Compendium, DRUGDEX, and Clinical Pharmacology to the list of compendia. DrugPoints was not added, and AMA-DE was removed. Because of the potential for conflicts of interest to lead to biased judgments, the 2008 Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act has a provision that explicitly prohibits inclusion of compendia that do not have a publicly transparent process for evaluating therapies and identifying potential conflicts of interest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19221368     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-5-200903030-00109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Off-label therapy: current problems from the perspective of the Pharmaceutical Commission of the German Medical Profession].

Authors:  R W C Janzen; W D Ludwig
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  The notorious "drug lag" for oncology drugs in Japan.

Authors:  Kan Yonemori; Akihiro Hirakawa; Masashi Ando; Taizo Hirata; Mayu Yunokawa; Chikako Shimizu; Noriyuki Katsumata; Kenji Tamura; Yasuhiro Fujiwara
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Evidence Underlying Recommendations and Payments from Industry to Authors of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines.

Authors:  Xu Liu; Ling-Long Tang; Yan-Ping Mao; Qing Liu; Ying Sun; Lei Chen; Jin-Ching Lin; Jun Ma
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-11-20

4.  Off-label prescribing: a call for heightened professional and government oversight.

Authors:  Rebecca Dresser; Joel Frader
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.718

5.  Frequency and level of evidence used in recommendations by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines beyond approvals of the US Food and Drug Administration: retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Jeffrey Wagner; John Marquart; Julia Ruby; Austin Lammers; Sham Mailankody; Victoria Kaestner; Vinay Prasad
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-03-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.