Literature DB >> 19221300

Teaching the next generation of neurologists.

Mitchell S V Elkind1.   

Abstract

Educators of the next generation of neurologists will face several challenges, including changes in academic medical centers and hospitals, changes in the scope and practice of neurology itself, and changes in trainees, related to both access to information technology and professional goals. This article, which originated as a lecture given at the A.B. Baker Education Symposium at the 60th annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology in April 2008, arose out of an attempt to enumerate these challenges and to suggest ways to address them. First, approaches to overcoming challenges will likely require reinvigorating the commitment to teaching in fundamental and concrete ways, including, for example, establishing communities of educators and taking seriously the teaching role provided by clinicians. Second, it is expected that changes in the scope of educational content will be needed. Learning the role of the neurologist in a broader societal context will become an increasingly important part of training. It should be emphasized, as well, that trainees should play an important role in the redesign of neurology training and practice; in fact, their participation in this hidden curriculum constitutes an important part of their education. Third, new information technologies, such as Google, Wikipedias, and podcasting, will likely play an increasingly important role in neurology education. Finally, generational differences in familiarity with these new technologies, and differences in professional and personal goals, may lead to different career opportunities and plans for future neurologists than have been considered the norm in the past.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19221300     DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000342516.08077.55

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  6 in total

1.  The pathology informatics curriculum wiki: Harnessing the power of user-generated content.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Kim; Thomas M Gudewicz; Anand S Dighe; John R Gilbertson
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2010-07-13

2.  The Google+ Project and neurosciences: Will it be as supercalifragilistic-expialidocious as expected?

Authors:  Georgios K Matis; Danilo O de A Silva; Olga I Chrysou; Theodossios A Birbilis
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2011-07

3.  Webinar software: a tool for developing more effective lectures (online or in-person).

Authors:  Eduardo P Mayorga; Jesica G Bekerman; Ana G Palis
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun

Review 4.  Preventing "Neurophobia": Remodeling Neurology Education for 21st-Century Medical Students through Effective Pedagogical Strategies for "Neurophilia".

Authors:  Bhaskara P Shelley; Thomas V Chacko; Balakrishnan R Nair
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.383

Review 5.  Curing neurophobia in medical schools: evidence-based strategies.

Authors:  Abdelrahman Ibrahim Abushouk; Nguyen Minh Duc
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2016-09-27

6.  Will "Hybrid" Meetings Replace Face-To-Face Meetings Post COVID-19 Era? Perceptions and Views From The Urological Community.

Authors:  Bm Zeeshan Hameed; Yiloren Tanidir; Nithesh Naik; Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh; Milap Shah; Marcelo Langer Wroclawski; Afrah Budnar Kunjibettu; Daniele Castellani; Sufyan Ibrahim; Rodrigo Donalisio da Silva; Bhavan Rai; J J M C H de la Rosette; Rajeev Tp; Vineet Gauhar; Bhaskar Somani
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 2.649

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.