Literature DB >> 19220713

Comparison of pain thresholds and pain tolerance levels between Middle Easterners and Swedes and between genders.

A Dawson1, T List.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the presence of culture and gender differences in pain thresholds and pain tolerance levels between Middle Easterners and Swedes.
METHODS: Sixty-four healthy individuals, 32 Middle Easterners (16 men and 16 women, mean age: 24.6 +/- 3.4 years) and 32 Swedes (16 men and 16 women, mean age: 24 +/- 3.5 years) participated in the study. Three experimental pain tests were conducted in each participant. Pain thresholds and pain tolerance levels were measured using an algometer (mechanical stimulus), the PainMatcher((R)) (electric stimulus) and cold pressor test (thermal stimulus).
RESULTS: While no significant differences in pain thresholds were observed between Middle Easterners and Swedes in algometer and cold pressor tests, differences in pain tolerance levels were significant (P < 0.01 for both tests). All between-culture differences in pain perception, pain threshold and pain tolerance level were non-significant when measured with the PainMatcher. Significant between-gender differences were observed only in pain threshold with the PainMatcher (P < 0.05) and in pain tolerance level with the algometer (P < 0.01) and the PainMatcher (P <0.001).
CONCLUSION: This study found significant differences in two out of three pain tolerance level tests - but not pain threshold tests - between the Middle Eastern and Swedish cultures and between genders. These differences were more pronounced between Middle Eastern and Swedish men than between Middle Eastern and Swedish women. Gender differences were more pronounced within the Swedish than the Middle Eastern culture. These findings indicate that culture and gender influence pain experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19220713     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01943.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  6 in total

1.  In vivo and in vitro comparison of female and male nociceptors.

Authors:  Jan Hendrich; Pedro Alvarez; Elizabeth K Joseph; Luiz F Ferrari; Xiaojie Chen; Jon D Levine
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 5.820

2.  Pressure pain sensitivity maps of the neck-shoulder and the low back regions in men and women.

Authors:  Asbjørn T Binderup; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Pascal Madeleine
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Chronic pain and sex-differences; women accept and move, while men feel blue.

Authors:  Graciela S Rovner; Katharina S Sunnerhagen; Ann Björkdahl; Björn Gerdle; Björn Börsbo; Fredrik Johansson; David Gillanders
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Comparison of the Anaesthesia Success Rate in Maxillary First and Second Molars with 3% Prilocaine as the Anaesthetic Agent.

Authors:  Masoud Parirokh; Iman Samadi; Nouzar Nakhaee; Paul Abbott
Journal:  Eur Endod J       Date:  2021-12

5.  An Investigation of Pain Beliefs, Pain Coping, and Spiritual Well-Being in Surgical Patients.

Authors:  Emel Gülnar; Hüsna Özveren; Hilal Tüzer; Tuba Yılmazer
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2021-07-16

6.  Bupivacaine-sufentanil versus bupivacaine-fentanyl in spinal anesthesia of patients undergoing lower extremity surgery.

Authors:  Valiollah Hassani; Gholamreza Movassaghi; Reza Safaian; Saeid Safari; Mohammad Mahdi Zamani; Maryam Hajiashrafi; Minow Sedaghat
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2014-03-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.