S Lottanti1, H Gautschi, B Sener, M Zehnder. 1. Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the effects of ethylenediaminetetraacetic (EDTA), etidronic (EA) and peracetic acid (PA) when used in conjunction with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) as root canal irrigants on calcium eluted from canals, smear layer, and root dentine demineralization after instrumentation/irrigation. METHODOLOGY: Single-rooted human premolars were irrigated as follows (n = 12 per group): (1) 1% NaOCl during instrumentation, deionized water after instrumentation, (2) 1% NaOCl during, 17% EDTA after instrumentation, (3) a 1 : 1-mixture of 2% NaOCl and 18% EA during and after instrumentation, and (4) 1% NaOCl during, 2.25% PA after instrumentation. Irrigant volumes and contact times were 10 mL/15 min during and 5 mL/3 min after instrumentation. The evaluated outcomes were eluted calcium by atomic absorption spectroscopy, smear-covered areas by scanning electron microscopy in secondary electron mode and apparent canal wall decalcifications on root transsections in backscatter mode. For the smear layer analysis, sclerotic dentine was taken into consideration. Results were compared using appropriate parametric and nonparametric tests, alpha = 0.05. RESULTS: The statistical comparison of the protocols regarding calcium elution revealed that protocol (1) yielded less calcium than (3), which yielded less than protocols (2) and (4). Most of the instrumented canal walls treated with one of the decalcifying agents were free of smear layer. Protocols (1) and (3) caused no decalcification of root dentine, whilst (2) and (4) showed substance typical demineralization patterns. CONCLUSIONS: The decalcifying agents under investigation were all able to remove or prevent a smear layer. However, they eroded the dentine wall differently.
AIM: To evaluate the effects of ethylenediaminetetraacetic (EDTA), etidronic (EA) and peracetic acid (PA) when used in conjunction with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) as root canal irrigants on calcium eluted from canals, smear layer, and root dentine demineralization after instrumentation/irrigation. METHODOLOGY: Single-rooted human premolars were irrigated as follows (n = 12 per group): (1) 1% NaOCl during instrumentation, deionized water after instrumentation, (2) 1% NaOCl during, 17% EDTA after instrumentation, (3) a 1 : 1-mixture of 2% NaOCl and 18% EA during and after instrumentation, and (4) 1% NaOCl during, 2.25% PA after instrumentation. Irrigant volumes and contact times were 10 mL/15 min during and 5 mL/3 min after instrumentation. The evaluated outcomes were eluted calcium by atomic absorption spectroscopy, smear-covered areas by scanning electron microscopy in secondary electron mode and apparent canal wall decalcifications on root transsections in backscatter mode. For the smear layer analysis, sclerotic dentine was taken into consideration. Results were compared using appropriate parametric and nonparametric tests, alpha = 0.05. RESULTS: The statistical comparison of the protocols regarding calcium elution revealed that protocol (1) yielded less calcium than (3), which yielded less than protocols (2) and (4). Most of the instrumented canal walls treated with one of the decalcifying agents were free of smear layer. Protocols (1) and (3) caused no decalcification of root dentine, whilst (2) and (4) showed substance typical demineralization patterns. CONCLUSIONS: The decalcifying agents under investigation were all able to remove or prevent a smear layer. However, they eroded the dentine wall differently.
Authors: Wasudeo Namdeo Ghonmode; Omkar D Balsaraf; Varsha H Tambe; K P Saujanya; Ashishkumar K Patil; Deepak D Kakde Journal: J Int Oral Health Date: 2013-12-26
Authors: Luciano Giardino; Massimo Del Fabbro; Marco Morra; Thais Pereira; Flaviana Bombarda de Andrade; Paolo Savadori; Luigi Generali Journal: Odontology Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 2.634
Authors: Colin Eliot; John F Hatton; Gregory P Stewart; Charles F Hildebolt; M Jane Gillespie; James L Gutmann Journal: Odontology Date: 2013-01-19 Impact factor: 2.634