Literature DB >> 19220359

Recombinant bacteria for environmental release: what went wrong and what we have learnt from it.

V de Lorenzo1.   

Abstract

From a biotechnological point of view, bacteria can be seen as either pathogens to target with new drugs or as biocatalysts for large-scale processes in industry, agriculture or the environment. The last includes the exploitation of bacterial activities for bioremediation of toxic waste either in situ or ex situ. The onset of genetic engineering in the late 70s opened the possibility of tailoring recombinant bacteria for environmental release, aimed at biodegradation of otherwise recalcitrant chemicals. However, a few decades later the outcome of this prospect has been quite meager. The literature counts very few cases where the use of genetically engineered bacteria has been proven to be more efficient than natural microorganisms in elimination of recalcitrant compounds under natural (not laboratory) conditions. Fortunately, the emergence of Systems and Synthetic Biology in the last few years is helping to identify what were the caveats of the former approaches and how to correct them. In addition, robust design concepts imported from process engineering provides fresh approaches to the challenge of designing microorganisms á la carte for environmental applications.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19220359     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02683.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  18 in total

Review 1.  Bioengineering of Nitrilases Towards Its Use as Green Catalyst: Applications and Perspectives.

Authors:  Vinod K Nigam; Tesnim Arfi; Vishal Kumar; Pratyoosh Shukla
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 2.461

Review 2.  Controlling the Implementation of Transgenic Microbes: Are We Ready for What Synthetic Biology Has to Offer?

Authors:  Finn Stirling; Pamela A Silver
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 3.  Microbial Interventions in Bioremediation of Heavy Metal Contaminants in Agroecosystem.

Authors:  Veni Pande; Satish Chandra Pandey; Diksha Sati; Pankaj Bhatt; Mukesh Samant
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 6.064

4.  A Pseudomonas putida strain genetically engineered for 1,2,3-trichloropropane bioremediation.

Authors:  Ghufrana Samin; Martina Pavlova; M Irfan Arif; Christiaan P Postema; Jiri Damborsky; Dick B Janssen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Transformation and biodegradation of 1,2,3-trichloropropane (TCP).

Authors:  Ghufrana Samin; Dick B Janssen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Synthetic circuit designs for earth terraformation.

Authors:  Ricard V Solé; Raúl Montañez; Salva Duran-Nebreda
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 4.540

7.  The Standard European Vector Architecture (SEVA): a coherent platform for the analysis and deployment of complex prokaryotic phenotypes.

Authors:  Rafael Silva-Rocha; Esteban Martínez-García; Belén Calles; Max Chavarría; Alejandro Arce-Rodríguez; Aitor de Las Heras; A David Páez-Espino; Gonzalo Durante-Rodríguez; Juhyun Kim; Pablo I Nikel; Raúl Platero; Víctor de Lorenzo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Evolution, ecology and the engineered organism: lessons for synthetic biology.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Skerker; Julius B Lucks; Adam P Arkin
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 13.583

Review 9.  Synthetic constructs in/for the environment: managing the interplay between natural and engineered Biology.

Authors:  Markus Schmidt; Víctor de Lorenzo
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 4.124

10.  Genome-wide analysis of Sphingomonas wittichii RW1 behaviour during inoculation and growth in contaminated sand.

Authors:  Silvia K Moreno-Forero; Jan Roelof van der Meer
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 10.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.