Literature DB >> 19219860

Thiazolidinediones: effects on the development and progression of type 2 diabetes and associated vascular complications.

Andrew Krentz1.   

Abstract

In addition to reducing hyperglycaemia, the metabolic actions of TZDs (pioglitazone and rosiglitazone) in theory might improve the prognosis of patients with type 2 diabetes. However, it appears from recent data that pioglitazone and rosiglitazone have different cardiovascular risk profiles. The scope of this paper is to examine the benefits and risks of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone. Three large clinical studies (DREAM, and ADOPT with rosiglitazone; PROactive with pioglitazone) have recently been reported. A lower annual rate of decline of ss-cell function observed with rosiglitazone in the ADOPT study, compared with metformin and glyburide (glibenclamide), along with a reduced progression to insulin use seen with pioglitazone in the PROactive study, provides evidence that TZDs are effective in treating progressive hyperglycaemia. In PROactive, although the primary endpoint was not met, pioglitazone was associated with a reduction in a secondary composite endpoint of clinical cardiovascular events in high-risk patients with existing macrovascular disease who were already receiving other glycaemic and cardiovascular medications. Further evidence supporting an anti-atherogenic effect of pioglitazone was gained from the PERISCOPE study of carotid intima-media thickness. Recent controversy concerning a possible increased risk of myocardial infarction associated with rosiglitazone has fuelled uncertainty about the risk-benefit profile of this agent. In 2008, an update of an American Diabetes Association-European Association for the Study of Diabetes consensus statement on initiation and adjustment of therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes advised clinicians against using rosiglitazone. Skeletal fractures have recently emerged as a side effect of both TZDs. Available data suggest that cardiovascular benefits observed with pioglitazone might not be a class effect of TZDs. Copyright (c) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19219860     DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev        ISSN: 1520-7552            Impact factor:   4.876


  8 in total

1.  Rosiglitazone: trials, tribulations and termination.

Authors:  Andrew J Krentz
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Effects of rosiglitazone on the configuration of action potentials and ion currents in canine ventricular cells.

Authors:  N Szentandrássy; G Harmati; L Bárándi; J Simkó; B Horváth; J Magyar; T Bányász; I Lorincz; A Szebeni; V Kecskeméti; P P Nánási
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  Naturally-Derived Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering Applications.

Authors:  Matthew Brovold; Joana I Almeida; Iris Pla-Palacín; Pilar Sainz-Arnal; Natalia Sánchez-Romero; Jesus J Rivas; Helen Almeida; Pablo Royo Dachary; Trinidad Serrano-Aulló; Shay Soker; Pedro M Baptista
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 4.  Therapeutic developments in Friedreich ataxia.

Authors:  Robert B Wilson
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 1.987

5.  Can the electrophysiological action of rosiglitazone explain its cardiac side effects?

Authors:  A Szebeni; N Szentandrássy; P Pacher; J Simkó; P P Nánási; V Kecskeméti
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Gene expression microarray analysis of the sciatic nerve of mice with diabetic neuropathy.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Shen Qu; Aibin Liang; Hong Jiang; Hao Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.101

7.  Pioglitazone Is Associated with Lower Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events than DPP4-Inhibitors in Diabetic Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease: A Taiwan Nationwide Cohort Study, 2006-2016.

Authors:  Min-Hao Lin; Huang-Yu Yang; Chieh-Li Yen; Chao-Yi Wu; Chang-Chyi Jenq; George Kuo; Wei-Sheng Peng; Jia-Rou Liu; Ya-Chung Tian; Chih-Wei Yang; Gerard F Anderson; Lai-Chu See
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  PPARγ modulates vascular smooth muscle cell phenotype via a protein kinase G-dependent pathway and reduces neointimal hyperplasia after vascular injury.

Authors:  Han-Mo Yang; Baek-Kyung Kim; Ju-Young Kim; Yoo-Wook Kwon; Sooryeonhwa Jin; Joo-Eun Lee; Hyun-Jai Cho; Hae-Young Lee; Hyun-Jae Kang; Byung-Hee Oh; Young-Bae Park; Hyo-Soo Kim
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 8.718

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.