Literature DB >> 19219489

Effective protection of open space: does planning matter?

Toddi A Steelman1, George R Hess.   

Abstract

High quality plans are considered a crucial part of good land use planning and often used as a proxy measure for success in plan implementation and goal attainment. We explored the relationship of open space plan quality to the implementation of open space plans and attainment of open space protection goals in Research Triangle, North Carolina, USA. To measure plan quality, we used a standard plan evaluation matrix that we modified to focus on open space plans. We evaluated all open space plans in the region that contained a natural resource protection element. To measure plan implementation and open space protection, we developed an online survey and administered it to open space planners charged with implementing the plans. The survey elicited each planner's perspective on aspects of open space protection in his or her organization. The empirical results (1) indicate that success in implementation and attaining goals are not related to plan quality, (2) highlight the importance of when and how stakeholders are involved in planning and implementation processes, and (3) raise questions about the relationship of planning to implementation. These results suggest that a technically excellent plan does not guarantee the long-term relationships among local land owners, political and appointed officials, and other organizations that are crucial to meeting land protection goals. A greater balance of attention to the entire decision process and building relationships might lead to more success in protecting open space.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19219489     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-009-9272-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  4 in total

1.  Theory into practice: implementing ecosystem management objectives in the USDA Forest Service.

Authors:  Kelly F Butler; Tomas M Koontz
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Adaptive decision rules for the acquisition of nature reserves.

Authors:  Will R Turner; David S Wilcove
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.560

3.  Implementing ecosystem management in public agencies: lessons from the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service.

Authors:  Tomas M Koontz; Jennifer Bodine
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity.

Authors:  Jianguo Liu; Gretchen C Daily; Paul R Ehrlich; Gary W Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-12       Impact factor: 49.962

  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  Public participation in local government review of development proposals in hazardous locations: does it matter, and what do local government planners have to do with it?

Authors:  Mark R Stevens; Philip R Berke; Yan Song
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Benefits and challenges of linking green infrastructure and highway planning in the United States.

Authors:  Daniel J Marcucci; Lauren M Jordan
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Conserving biodiversity takes a plan: How planners implement ecological information for biodiversity conservation.

Authors:  Sara A Gagné; Kaitlynn Bryan-Scaggs; Robert H W Boyer; Wei-Ning Xiang
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 5.129

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.