Literature DB >> 19219232

[Validity of self-reported gestational diabetes mellitus in the immediate postpartum].

Maria Alice Souza de Oliveira Dode1, Iná S Santos.   

Abstract

Studies based on self-reporting of risk factors or morbidity are useful in public health, due mainly to the low cost and ease of data collection, but the accuracy of the resulting data is important for the internal validity of the research. The aim of this study was to evaluate the agreement between self-reported gestational diabetes mellitus and prenatal care medical records (gold standard). Agreement was measured by sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, kappa statistic, and confidence intervals (95%CI). From July to December 2007, all the women who gave birth in three maternity hospitals in Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, were visited in the immediate postpartum. 1,047 women were interviewed, of whom 872 were in possession of their prenatal care card; of these, 869 had their blood glucose recorded on the card. Mean age was 26.7 years. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus based on the gold standard was 4.3% (95%CI: 3.0-5.8), while the self-reported rate was 4% (95%CI: 2.8-5.5). Sensitivity of self-reported gestational diabetes mellitus was 72.9% (95%CI: 55.9-86.2); specificity was 99% (95%CI: 98.1-99.6); accuracy 97.9% (95%CI: 96.7-98.7); kappa 74%. For this population, self-reported gestational diabetes mellitus is valid information and can be used in population-based studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19219232     DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x2009000200003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cad Saude Publica        ISSN: 0102-311X            Impact factor:   1.632


  5 in total

1.  Validity of self-reported diabetes among middle-aged and older Chinese adults: the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Xiaojing Yuan; Tingting Liu; Lang Wu; Zhi-Yong Zou; Changwei Li
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Gestational diabetes mellitus, pre-gestational BMI and offspring BMI z-score during infancy and childhood: 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort.

Authors:  Romina Buffarini; Aluisio J D Barros; Alicia Matijasevich; Christian Loret de Mola; Ina S Santos
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Influence of Acculturation on Risk for Gestational Diabetes Among Asian Women.

Authors:  Liwei Chen; Lu Shi; Donglan Zhang; Shin Margaret Chao
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Agreement of antenatal care indicators from self-reported questionnaire and the antenatal care card of women in the 2015 Pelotas birth cohort, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Authors:  Lina Sofia Morón-Duarte; Andrea Ramirez Varela; Diego G Bassani; Andrea Dâmaso Bertoldi; Marlos R Domingues; Fernando C Wehrmeister; Mariangela Freitas Silveira
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Identifying diabetics in Medicare claims and survey data: implications for health services research.

Authors:  Joseph W Sakshaug; David R Weir; Lauren H Nicholas
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.