Literature DB >> 19218581

Use of sediment CO2 by submersed rooted plants.

Anders Winkel1, Jens Borum.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Submersed plants have different strategies to overcome inorganic carbon limitation. It is generally assumed that only small rosette species (isoetids) are able to utilize the high sediment CO(2) availability. The present study examined to what extent five species of submersed freshwater plants with different morphology and growth characteristics (Lobelia dortmanna, Lilaeopsis macloviana, Ludwigia repens, Vallisneria americana and Hydrocotyle verticillata) are able to support photosynthesis supplied by uptake of CO(2) from the sediment.
METHODS: Gross photosynthesis was measured in two-compartment split chambers with low inorganic carbon availability in leaf compartments and variable CO(2) availability (0 to >8 mmol L(-1)) in root compartments. Photosynthetic rates based on root-supplied CO(2) were compared with maximum rates obtained at saturating leaf CO(2) availability, and (14)C experiments were conducted for two species to localize bottlenecks for utilization of sediment CO(2). KEY
RESULTS: All species except Hydrocotyle were able to use sediment CO(2), however, with variable efficiency, and with the isoetid, Lobelia, as clearly the most effective and the elodeid, Ludwigia, as the least efficient. At a water column CO(2) concentration in equilibrium with air, Lobelia, Lilaeopsis and Vallisneria covered >75% of their CO(2) requirements by sediment uptake, and sediment CO(2) contributed substantially to photosynthesis at water CO(2) concentrations up to 1000 micromol L(-1). For all species except Ludwigia, the shoot to root ratio on an areal basis was the single factor best explaining variability in the importance of sediment CO(2). For Ludwigia, diffusion barriers limited uptake or transport from roots to stems and transport from stems to leaves.
CONCLUSIONS: Submersed plants other than isoetids can utilize sediment CO(2), and small and medium sized elodeids with high root to shoot area in particular may benefit substantially from uptake of sediment CO(2) in low alkaline lakes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19218581      PMCID: PMC2707917          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcp036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  2 in total

Review 1.  Conditions leading to high CO2 (>5 kPa) in waterlogged-flooded soils and possible effects on root growth and metabolism.

Authors:  Hank Greenway; William Armstrong; Timothy D Colmer
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Iron plaques improve the oxygen supply to root meristems of the freshwater plant, Lobelia dortmanna.

Authors:  Claus Lindskov Møller; Kaj Sand-Jensen
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 10.151

  2 in total
  5 in total

1.  Correlative adaptation between Rubisco and CO2-concentrating mechanisms in seagrasses.

Authors:  Sebastià Capó-Bauçà; Concepción Iñiguez; Pere Aguiló-Nicolau; Jeroni Galmés
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 17.352

2.  In situ O2 dynamics in submerged Isoetes australis: varied leaf gas permeability influences underwater photosynthesis and internal O2.

Authors:  Ole Pedersen; Cristina Pulido; Sarah Meghan Rich; Timothy David Colmer
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 6.992

3.  A perspective on underwater photosynthesis in submerged terrestrial wetland plants.

Authors:  Timothy D Colmer; Anders Winkel; Ole Pedersen
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 3.276

4.  Comparing photosynthetic characteristics of Isoetes sinensis Palmer under submerged and terrestrial conditions.

Authors:  Tao Yang; Xing Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  The Future of Freshwater Macrophytes in a Changing World: Dissolved Organic Carbon Quantity and Quality and Its Interactions With Macrophytes.

Authors:  Rosanne E Reitsema; Patrick Meire; Jonas Schoelynck
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 5.753

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.