Literature DB >> 19218579

Using phenotypic manipulations to study multivariate selection of floral trait associations.

Diane R Campbell1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A basic theme in the study of plant-pollinator interactions is that pollinators select not just for single floral traits, but for associations of traits. Responses of pollinators to sets of traits are inherent in the idea of pollinator syndromes. In its most extreme form, selection on a suite of traits can take the form of correlational selection, in which a response to one trait depends on the value of another, thereby favouring floral integration. Despite the importance of selection for combinations of traits in the evolution of flowers, evidence is relatively sparse and relies mostly on observational approaches. SCOPE: Here, methods for measuring selection on multivariate suites of floral traits are presented, and the studies to date are reviewed. It is argued that phenotypic manipulations present a powerful, but rarely used, approach to teasing apart the separate and combined effects of particular traits. The approach is illustrated with data from studies of alpine plants in Colorado and New Zealand, and recommendations are made about several features of the design of such experiments.
CONCLUSIONS: Phenotypic manipulations of two or more traits in combination provide a direct way of testing for selection of floral trait associations. Such experiments will be particularly valuable if rooted in hypotheses about differences between types of pollinators and tied to a proposed evolutionary history.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19218579      PMCID: PMC2701750          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcp032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  16 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of color vision in insects.

Authors:  A D Briscoe; L Chittka
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Stability of the G-matrix in a population experiencing pleiotropic mutation, stabilizing selection, and genetic drift.

Authors:  Adam G Jones; Stevan J Arnold; Reinhard Bürger
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Opposing natural selection from herbivores and pathogens may maintain floral-color variation in Claytonia virginica (Portulacaceae).

Authors:  Frank M Frey
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  A global test of the pollination syndrome hypothesis.

Authors:  Jeff Ollerton; Ruben Alarcón; Nickolas M Waser; Mary V Price; Stella Watts; Louise Cranmer; Andrew Hingston; Craig I Peter; John Rotenberry
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  The adaptive value of phenotypic floral integration.

Authors:  Mariano Ordano; Juan Fornoni; Karina Boege; César A Domínguez
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Covariance and decoupling of floral and vegetative traits in nine Neotropical plants: a re-evaluation of Berg's correlation-pleiades concept.

Authors:  W S Armbruster; V S Di Stilio; J D Tuxill; T C Flores; J L Velásquez Runk
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.844

7.  Natural selection on Erysimum mediohispanicum flower shape: insights into the evolution of zygomorphy.

Authors:  José M Gómez; Francisco Perfectti; Juan Pedro M Camacho
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 8.  Tests of adaptation: functional studies of pollen removal and estimates of natural selection on anther position in wild radish.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Conner; Heather F Sahli; Keith Karoly
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Behavioral consequences of innate preferences and olfactory learning in hawkmoth-flower interactions.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Riffell; Ruben Alarcón; Leif Abrell; Goggy Davidowitz; Judith L Bronstein; John G Hildebrand
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Allele substitution at a flower colour locus produces a pollinator shift in monkeyflowers.

Authors:  H D Bradshaw; Douglas W Schemske
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Ecology and evolution of plant-pollinator interactions.

Authors:  Randall J Mitchell; Rebecca E Irwin; Rebecca J Flanagan; Jeffrey D Karron
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Nectar alkaloids decrease pollination and female reproduction in a native plant.

Authors:  Lynn S Adler; Rebecca E Irwin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The evolution of signal-reward correlations in bee- and hummingbird-pollinated species of Salvia.

Authors:  Santiago Benitez-Vieyra; Juan Fornoni; Jessica Pérez-Alquicira; Karina Boege; César A Domínguez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Could seasonally deteriorating environments favour the evolution of autogamous selfing and a drought escape physiology through indirect selection? A test of the time limitation hypothesis using artificial selection in Clarkia.

Authors:  Simon K Emms; Alisa A Hove; Leah S Dudley; Susan J Mazer; Amy S Verhoeven
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 5.  The floral morphospace--a modern comparative approach to study angiosperm evolution.

Authors:  Marion Chartier; Florian Jabbour; Sylvain Gerber; Philipp Mitteroecker; Hervé Sauquet; Maria von Balthazar; Yannick Staedler; Peter R Crane; Jürg Schönenberger
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Urbanization threaten the pollination of Gentiana dahurica.

Authors:  Qin-Zheng Hou; Xia Pang; Yu-Pei Wang; Kun Sun; Ling-Yun Jia; Shi-Hu Zhang; Qiao-Xia Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.