Literature DB >> 19217991

Warfarin thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients with central venous catheters (WARP): an open-label randomised trial.

Annie M Young1, Lucinda J Billingham, Gulnaz Begum, David J Kerr, Ana I Hughes, Daniel W Rea, Stephen Shepherd, Andrew Stanley, Ann Sweeney, Jonathan Wilde, Keith Wheatley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role and dose of anticoagulants in thromboprophylaxis for patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy through central venous catheters (CVCs) is controversial. We therefore assessed whether warfarin reduces catheter-related thrombosis compared with no warfarin and whether the dose of warfarin determines the thromboprophylactic effect.
METHODS: In 68 clinical centres in the UK, we randomly assigned 1590 patients aged at least 16 years with cancer who were receiving chemotherapy through CVCs to no warfarin, fixed-dose warfarin 1 mg per day, or dose-adjusted warfarin per day to maintain an international normalised ratio between 1.5 and 2.0. Clinicians who were certain of the benefit of warfarin randomly assigned patients to fixed-dose or dose-adjusted warfarin groups. The primary outcome was the rate of radiologically proven, symptomatic catheter-related thrombosis. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN 50312145.
FINDINGS: Compared with no warfarin (n=404), warfarin (n=408; 324 [79%] on fixed-dose and 84 [21%] on dose-adjusted) did not reduce the rate of catheter-related thromboses (24 [6%] vs 24 [6%]; relative risk 0.99, 95% CI 0.57-1.72, p=0.98). However, compared with fixed-dose warfarin (n=471), dose-adjusted warfarin (n=473) was superior in the prevention of catheter-related thromboses (13 [3%] vs 34 [7%]; 0.38, 0.20-0.71, p=0.002). Major bleeding events were rare; an excess was noted with warfarin compared with no warfarin (7 vs 1, p=0.07) and with dose-adjusted warfarin compared with fixed-dose warfarin (16 vs 7, p=0.09). A combined endpoint of thromboses and major bleeding showed no difference between comparisons. We did not note a survival benefit in either comparison.
INTERPRETATION: The findings show that prophylactic warfarin compared with no warfarin is not associated with a reduction in symptomatic catheter-related or other thromboses in patients with cancer and therefore we should consider newer treatments. FUNDING: Medical Research Council and Cancer Research UK.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19217991     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60205-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  42 in total

Review 1.  Thrombosis and cancer.

Authors:  Annie Young; Oliver Chapman; Carole Connor; Christopher Poole; Peter Rose; Ajay K Kakkar
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Port catheter versus peripherally inserted central catheter for postoperative chemotherapy in early breast cancer: a retrospective analysis of 448 patients.

Authors:  L Lefebvre; E Noyon; D Georgescu; V Proust; C Alexandru; M Leheurteur; J C Thery; L Savary; O Rigal; F Di Fiore; C Veyret; F Clatot
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Primary venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with solid tumors: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Minh Phan; Sonia John; Ana I Casanegra; Suman Rathbun; Aaron Mansfield; Julie A Stoner; Alfonso J Tafur
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Canadian consensus recommendations on the management of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. Part 1: prophylaxis.

Authors:  J C Easaw; M A Shea-Budgell; C M J Wu; P M Czaykowski; J Kassis; B Kuehl; H J Lim; M MacNeil; D Martinusen; P A McFarlane; E Meek; O Moodley; S Shivakumar; V Tagalakis; S Welch; P Kavan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  High incidence of thromboembolic events in patients treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a large retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Russell A Moore; Nelly Adel; Elyn Riedel; Manisha Bhutani; Darren R Feldman; Nour Elise Tabbara; Gerald Soff; Rekha Parameswaran; Hani Hassoun
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Clinical pearls in thrombosis and anticoagulation.

Authors:  Geno J Merli; Scott C Litin
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Venous thromboembolic disease.

Authors:  Michael B Streiff; Paula L Bockenstedt; Spero R Cataland; Carolyn Chesney; Charles Eby; John Fanikos; Patrick F Fogarty; Shuwei Gao; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Hani Hassoun; Paul Hendrie; Bjorn Holmstrom; Kimberly A Jones; Nicole Kuderer; Jason T Lee; Michael M Millenson; Anne T Neff; Thomas L Ortel; Judy L Smith; Gary C Yee; Anaadriana Zakarija
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 11.908

8.  Primary venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with solid tumors.

Authors:  A Casanegra; A Mansfield; A Tafur
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 9.  Thrombosis in cancer patients: etiology, incidence, and management.

Authors:  Rahul A Sheth; Andrew Niekamp; Keith B Quencer; Fadi Shamoun; Martha-Gracia Knuttinen; Sailendra Naidu; Rahmi Oklu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-12

10.  Variability in the management of line-related upper extremity deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Rafael Cires-Drouet; Jashank Sharma; Tara McDonald; John D Sorkin; Brajesh K Lal
Journal:  Phlebology       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 1.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.