Literature DB >> 19217801

Transesophageal echocardiography for verification of the position of the electrocardiographically-placed central venous catheter.

Joerg Ender1, Gabor Erdoes, Eugen Krohmer, Derk Olthoff, Chirojit Mukherjee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Compare changes in P-wave amplitude of the intra-atrial electrocardiogram (ECG) and its corresponding transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-controlled position to verify the exact localization of a central venous catheter (CVC) tip.
DESIGN: A prospective study.
SETTING: University, single-institutional setting. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.
INTERVENTIONS: CVC placement via the right internal jugular vein with ECG control using the guidewire technique and TEE control in 4 different phases: phase 1: CVC placement with normalized P wave and measurement of distance from the crista terminalis to the CVC tip; phase 2: TEE-controlled placement of the CVC tip; parallel to the superior vena cava (SVC) and measurements of P-wave amplitude; phase 3: influence of head positioning on CVC migration; and phase 4: evaluation of positioning of the CVC postoperatively using a chest x-ray.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The CVC tip could only be visualized in 67 patients on TEE with a normalized P wave. In 198 patients with the CVC parallel to the SVC wall controlled by TEE (phase 2), an elevated P wave was observed. Different head movements led to no significant migration of the CVC (phase 3). On a postoperative chest-x-ray, the CVC position was correct in 87.6% (phase 4).
CONCLUSION: The study suggests that the position of the CVC tip is located parallel to the SVC and 1.5 cm above the crista terminalis if the P wave starts to decrease during withdrawal of the catheter. The authors recommend that ECG control as per their study should be routinely used for placement of central venous catheters via the right internal jugular vein.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19217801     DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2008.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth        ISSN: 1053-0770            Impact factor:   2.628


  6 in total

1.  The supraclavicular fossa ultrasound view for central venous catheter placement and catheter change over guidewire.

Authors:  Se-Chan Kim; Christian Klebach; Ingo Heinze; Andreas Hoeft; Georg Baumgarten; Stefan Weber
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Verification of correct central venous catheter placement in the emergency department: comparison between ultrasonography and chest radiography.

Authors:  Maurizio Zanobetti; Alessandro Coppa; Federico Bulletti; Serena Piazza; Peyman Nazerian; Alberto Conti; Francesca Innocenti; Stefano Ponchietti; Sofia Bigiarini; Aurelia Guzzo; Claudio Poggioni; Beatrice Del Taglia; Yuri Mariannini; Riccardo Pini
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  Electrocardiogram-guided Technique: An Alternative Method for Confirming Central Venous Catheter Tip Placement.

Authors:  Arun Kumar Krishnan; Priya Menon; K P Gireesh Kumar; T P Sreekrishnan; Manish Garg; S Vijay Kumar
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

4.  A comparative study of safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided infra-clavicular axillary vein cannulation versus ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein cannulation in adult cardiac surgical patients.

Authors:  Prajakta D Shinde; Amish Jasapara; Kishan Bansode; Rohit Bunage; Anvay Mulay; Vijay L Shetty
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun

5.  Evaluation of routine postoperative chest roentgenogram for determination of the correct position of permanent central venous catheters tip.

Authors:  Fereshteh Salimi; Ali Hekmatnia; Javad Shahabi; Amir Keshavarzian; Mohammad Reza Maracy; Amir Hosein Davarpanah Jazi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.852

6.  The "rapid atrial swirl sign" for assessing central venous catheters: Performance by medical residents after limited training.

Authors:  Peter Korsten; Eirini Mavropoulou; Susanne Wienbeck; David Ellenberger; Daniel Patschan; Michael Zeisberg; Radovan Vasko; Björn Tampe; Gerhard A Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.