Literature DB >> 19217696

The use of penicillin skin testing to assess the prevalence of penicillin allergy in an emergency department setting.

Ali S Raja1, Christopher J Lindsell, Jonathan A Bernstein, Christopher D Codispoti, Joseph J Moellman.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Patient-reported penicillin allergies are often unreliable and can result in unnecessary changes in antibiotic therapy. Although penicillin allergy skin testing is commonly performed in allergy clinics, it has not been used in emergency departments (EDs) to verify self-reported allergies. We hypothesize that ED-based testing is possible and that the false-positive rate of patients with self-reported penicillin allergy are greater than 90%.
METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study enrolled a convenience sample of ED patients with a self-reported penicillin allergy. Patients were enrolled by one of 2 emergency physicians who performed skin prick and intracutaneous tests with penicillin major and minor determinants. The total testing time was 30 minutes. The proportion of false-positive self-reported allergies was computed with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by using the score method.
RESULTS: A total of 150 patients (mean age 42 years; SD 16 years; 46% men; 47% black) were enrolled. The false-positive rate for self-reported penicillin allergy was 137 of 150 (91.3%; 95% CI 85.3% to 95.1%). There were no adverse reactions associated with penicillin skin testing. Compared with patients with a false-positive penicillin allergy result (confirmed by negative penicillin skin testing result), patients reporting a true penicillin allergy confirmed by positive penicillin skin test results tended to be more frequently men (61.5% versus 44.5%; Delta 17.0%; 95% CI -13.5% to 42%), black (69.2% versus 44.5%; Delta 24.7%; 95% CI -6.9% to 46.8%), and have no family history of drug allergy (7.7% versus 17.5%; Delta9.8%; 95% CI -20.9% to 20.4%), but self-reported other drug allergies more frequently (61.5% versus 38.7%; Delta 22.9%; 95% CI -7.7% to 47.5%).
CONCLUSION: Penicillin skin testing is feasible in the ED setting. A substantial number of patients who self-report a penicillin allergy do not exhibit immunoglobulin E-mediated sensitization to penicillin major and minor determinants. Penicillin testing in the ED may allow the use of more appropriate antibiotics for patients presenting with a history of penicillin allergy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19217696      PMCID: PMC8215513          DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.12.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  31 in total

1.  PENICILLIN SKIN TEST PROCEDURE AND PREVENTION OF PENICILLIN REACTIONS.

Authors:  L B YEAGER; V E KVINGE
Journal:  J Lancet       Date:  1965-03

2.  [A new skin test for the detection of penicillin allergy].

Authors:  A de WECK; G BLUM
Journal:  Praxis       Date:  1963-01-17

3.  'Grandmother penicillin'--not in vogue, but clinically still effective.

Authors:  Patrick H Warnke; Stephan T Becker; Ingo N G Springer; Franz Härle; Uwe Ullmann; Paul A J Russo; Jörg Wiltfang; Helmut Fickenscher; Sabine Schubert
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Allergy diagnostic testing: an updated practice parameter.

Authors:  I Leonard Bernstein; James T Li; David I Bernstein; Robert Hamilton; Sheldon L Spector; Ricardo Tan; Scott Sicherer; David B K Golden; David A Khan; Richard A Nicklas; Jay M Portnoy; Joann Blessing-Moore; Linda Cox; David M Lang; John Oppenheimer; Christopher C Randolph; Diane E Schuller; Stephen A Tilles; Dana V Wallace; Estelle Levetin; Richard Weber
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 6.347

5.  Results of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Collaborative Clinical Trial to test the predictive value of skin testing with major and minor penicillin derivatives in hospitalized adults.

Authors:  D D Sogn; R Evans; G M Shepherd; T B Casale; J Condemi; P A Greenberger; P F Kohler; A Saxon; R J Summers; P P VanArsdel
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1992-05

Review 6.  Penicillin allergy skin testing: what do we do now?

Authors:  Jeremy A Schafer; Noe Mateo; Garry L Parlier; John C Rotschafer
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.705

Review 7.  Management of patients with a history of allergy to beta-lactam antibiotics.

Authors:  Anne B Yates
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Clinical experience with penicillin skin testing in a large inner-city STD clinic.

Authors:  J Gadde; M Spence; B Wheeler; N F Adkinson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-11-24       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Penicillin skin testing in patients with a history of beta-lactam allergy.

Authors:  Gonzalo Alvarez del Real; Mark E Rose; Maria T Ramirez-Atamoros; Jeffrey Hammel; Steven M Gordon; Alejandro C Arroliga; Mercedes E Arroliga
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 6.347

10.  Fluoroquinolone resistance during 2000-2005: an observational study.

Authors:  Richard J Ryan; Chris Lindsell; Paul Sheehan
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 3.090

View more
  22 in total

1.  Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015.

Authors:  Kimberly A Workowski; Gail A Bolan
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2015-06-05

2.  General principles of antimicrobial therapy.

Authors:  Surbhi Leekha; Christine L Terrell; Randall S Edson
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Improving Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Reported Penicillin Allergy.

Authors:  Kimberly G Blumenthal; Robert A Parker; Erica S Shenoy; Rochelle P Walensky
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 4.  The 3 Cs of Antibiotic Allergy-Classification, Cross-Reactivity, and Collaboration.

Authors:  Jason A Trubiano; Cosby A Stone; M Lindsay Grayson; Karen Urbancic; Monica A Slavin; Karin A Thursky; Elizabeth J Phillips
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2017-08-23

5.  Penicillin Allergy Delabeling: A Multidisciplinary Opportunity.

Authors:  Mary L Staicu; David Vyles; Erica S Shenoy; Cosby A Stone; Taylor Banks; Kristin S Alvarez; Kimberly G Blumenthal
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2020-10

6.  Impact of a clinical guideline for prescribing antibiotics to inpatients reporting penicillin or cephalosporin allergy.

Authors:  Kimberly G Blumenthal; Erica S Shenoy; Christy A Varughese; Shelley Hurwitz; David C Hooper; Aleena Banerji
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 6.347

Review 7.  Antibiotic allergy labels in hospitalized and critically ill adults: A review of current impacts of inaccurate labelling.

Authors:  Rebekah Moran; Misha Devchand; Olivia Smibert; Jason A Trubiano
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 8.  Immediate-type hypersensitivity drug reactions.

Authors:  Shelley F Stone; Elizabeth J Phillips; Michael D Wiese; Robert J Heddle; Simon G A Brown
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Beta-lactam antibiotic sensitization and its relationship to allergic diseases in tertiary hospital nurses.

Authors:  Inseon S Choi; Eui-Ryoung Han; Seong-Wook Lim; Seong-Ryoon Lim; Ji-Na Kim; Sin-Young Park; Su-Kyoung Chae; Hye-Hyeun Lim; Young-Ae Seol; You-In Bae; Young-Ho Won
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Immunol Res       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 5.764

10.  Prophylactic Antibiotic Choice and Risk of Surgical Site Infection After Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Shitanshu Uppal; John Harris; Ahmed Al-Niaimi; Carolyn W Swenson; Mark D Pearlman; R Kevin Reynolds; Neil Kamdar; Ali Bazzi; Darrell A Campbell; Daniel M Morgan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 7.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.