Literature DB >> 19217589

Just how stable are stable aesthetic features? Symmetry, complexity, and the jaws of massive familiarization.

Pablo P L Tinio1, Helmut Leder.   

Abstract

Using both group- and individual-level analyses, we explored the complex and dynamic effects of basic visual features on aesthetic judgment. Specifically, the mediating influence of familiarization on the combined effects of complexity and symmetry on aesthetic judgment was examined. Experiment 1 showed that symmetry and complexity are indeed powerful determinants of aesthetic judgment. Experiment 2 demonstrated that massive familiarization generated contrast effects for complexity: participants familiarized to simple stimuli subsequently judged complex stimuli more beautiful and participants familiarized to complex stimuli subsequently judged simple stimuli more beautiful. In contrast, moderate familiarization in Experiment 3 did not elicit the above effects. Group-level analyses were augmented with judgment analyses of individual response patterns resulting in a more comprehensive assessment of aesthetic judgment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19217589     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  17 in total

1.  Haptic aesthetics in the blind: A behavioral and fMRI investigation.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Lora T Likova
Journal:  IS&T Int Symp Electron Imaging       Date:  2018

2.  A Gaze-Driven Evolutionary Algorithm to Study Aesthetic Evaluation of Visual Symmetry.

Authors:  Alexis D J Makin; Marco Bertamini; Andrew Jones; Tim Holmes; Johannes M Zanker
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-03-22

3.  Predicting perceived visual complexity of abstract patterns using computational measures: The influence of mirror symmetry on complexity perception.

Authors:  Andreas Gartus; Helmut Leder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Shape familiarity modulates preference for curvature in drawings of common-use objects.

Authors:  Erick G Chuquichambi; Letizia Palumbo; Carlos Rey; Enric Munar
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  The sweetest thing: the influence of angularity, symmetry, and the number of elements on shape-valence and shape-taste matches.

Authors:  Alejandro Salgado-Montejo; Jorge A Alvarado; Carlos Velasco; Carlos J Salgado; Kendra Hasse; Charles Spence
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-15

6.  The Influence of Art Expertise and Training on Emotion and Preference Ratings for Representational and Abstract Artworks.

Authors:  Jorien van Paasschen; Francesca Bacci; David P Melcher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The small step toward asymmetry: Aesthetic judgment of broken symmetries.

Authors:  Andreas Gartus; Helmut Leder
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-07-19

8.  Aesthetic perception and its minimal content: a naturalistic perspective.

Authors:  Ioannis Xenakis; Argyris Arnellos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-19

9.  Cognitive control and unusual decisions about beauty: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Albert Flexas; Jaume Rosselló; Pedro de Miguel; Marcos Nadal; Enric Munar
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  What flowers do we like? The influence of shape and color on the rating of flower beauty.

Authors:  Martin Hůla; Jaroslav Flegr
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.