Literature DB >> 19216029

Association between socioeconomic status and burn injury severity.

Ju Ok Park1, Sang Do Shin, Jaiyong Kim, Kyoung Jun Song, Michael D Peck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been previously established that the incidence of burn is higher in lower socioeconomic (SES) groups. What is not clear, however, is whether or not the severity of burn is also higher in lower SES groups. The purpose of this study is to establish a relationship between household-level socioeconomic status (SES) and severity-based incidence of burn.
METHODS: A burn injury database was generated from the National Injury Database (2001-2003) with a 1-year follow-up period containing information about the date and time of burn injury, the International Classification of Disease 10th Edition-based (ICD-10) diagnostic codes, gender, age, residence, and type of insurance. In addition, we calculated the severity of each burn using the Excess Mortality Ratio-adjusted Injury Severity Score (EMR-ISS), which is similar to the New Injury Severity Score. Socioeconomic status was measured on the basis of quintiles of premiums for National Health Insurance, which was decided on a household-level either by monthly salary (Employee Insurance, EI) or by owned property (Self-Employed Insurance, SEI). Medical Aid (MA) population was regarded as a reference. After calculation of 5 year-gender specific standardized incidence rates (SIRs) of burn by SES groups, the association of SES and severity of burn was evaluated using a multivariate logistic regression model and the Cox-proportional hazard regression analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 870,411 burn cases were examined. The standardized incident rates (SIRs) of mild(1<or=EMR-ISS<or=8), moderate(9<or=EMR-ISS<or=24), severe(25<or=EMR-ISS<or=74), critical(EMR-ISS=75 or death), and total burn injury were 4951, 951, 124, 20, and 6046 per 1,000,000 person-years, respectively. Meaningful changes of relative risk by severity were found: it was greater in higher SES groups (0.67 in the highest SEI, 0.58 in the highest EI) compared to the Medical Aid (MA) population. For injuries classified to be greater than severe (25<or=EMR-ISS), odds ratios according to increase of SES level were significantly decreased to 0.77 in SEI and 0.63 in EI. For critical injuries, hazard ratios were also significantly decreased to 0.51 in the highest SEI and 0.32 in the highest EI.
CONCLUSIONS: Severity-based incidence of burn was significantly affected by household-level SES in a nationwide cohort study, with more severe injuries noted in the lower socioeconomic groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19216029     DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2008.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  19 in total

1.  The Effect of Pre-existing Seizure Disorders on Mortality and Hospital Length of Stay Following Burn Injury.

Authors:  Kenisha Atwell; Colleen Bartley; Bruce Cairns; Anthony Charles
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 1.845

2.  Influence of race and neighborhood on the risk for and outcomes of burns in the elderly in North Carolina.

Authors:  Laura Hendrix; Anthony Charles; Valorie Buchholz; Samuel Jones; Bruce Cairns
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 2.744

Review 3.  Burns in Israel: Etiologic, Demographic, and Clinical trends-A 9-Year Updated Comprehensive Study, 2004-2010 versus 2011-2019.

Authors:  Irit Cohen-Manheim; Moti Harats; Sharon Goldman; Dmitry Beylin; Josef Haik; Moran Bodas; Adi Givon; Rachel Kornhaber; Yehiel Hayun; Michelle Cleary; Daniel Hilewitz; Ariel Tessone
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.195

4.  Spiritual Transcendence and Psychological Adjustment: The Moderating Role of Personality in Burn Patients.

Authors:  Tahira Jibeen; Musferah Mahfooz; Shamem Fatima
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2018-10

5.  Reduction of plasma gelsolin levels correlates with development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and fatal outcome in burn patients.

Authors:  Li-feng Huang; Yong-ming Yao; Jin-feng Li; Ning Dong; Chen Liu; Yan Yu; Li-xin He; Zhi-yong Sheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Epidemiology, aetiology and knowledge, attitudes, and practices relating to burn injuries in Palestine: A community-level research.

Authors:  Ali H Abu Ibaid; Caitlin A Hebron; Hana'a A Qaysse; Melanie J Coyne; Tom S Potokar; Fikr A Shalltoot; Mahmoud A Shalabi
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 3.099

7.  Examination of Health Information Needs of Caregivers of and Individuals with Burn Injuries.

Authors:  Tammie M Jones; Alaanah Bhanji; Geeta Ahuja; Ramez Bakhtari; Xinsheng Cindy Cai; Steven Garfinkel; Lynn Gerber; Ali A Weinstein
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 1.819

8.  Impact of the affordable care act's medicaid expansion on burn outcomes and disposition.

Authors:  Jamie Oh; Amali Fernando; Stephen Sibbett; Gretchen J Carrougher; Barclay T Stewart; Samuel P Mandell; Tam N Pham; Nicole S Gibran
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.744

9.  Harborview burns--1974 to 2009.

Authors:  Loren H Engrav; David M Heimbach; Frederick P Rivara; Kathleen F Kerr; Turner Osler; Tam N Pham; Sam R Sharar; Peter C Esselman; Eileen M Bulger; Gretchen J Carrougher; Shari Honari; Nicole S Gibran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Geographic Variation in Outcomes After Burn Injury: A Burn Model System National Database Study.

Authors:  Leda F Espinoza; Jonathan Friedstat; Nicholas Faoro; Philip H Chang; Kara A McMullen; Laura C Simko; Peter Esselman; Radha Holavanahalli; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.763

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.