Literature DB >> 19215916

Comparisons of computer-controlled chamber measurements for soil-skin adherence from aluminum and carpet surfaces.

Alesia Ferguson1, Zoran Bursac, Sheire Coleman, Wayne Johnson.   

Abstract

A computer-controlled mechanical chamber was used to control the contact between carpet and aluminum sheet samples laden with soil, and human cadaver skin and cotton sheet samples for the measurement of mass soil transfer. The contact parameters of pressure (10-50 kPa) and time (10-50s) were varied for 768 experiments of mass soil transfer, where two soil types (play sand and lawn soil) and two soil particle sizes (<139.7 and 139.7<381 microm) were used. Mean soil mass transfer to cadaver skin was higher than mean transfer to cotton sheets for both carpet and aluminum transfers, and also generally higher pressure was associated with larger amounts of soil transfer for all contact scenarios. The mean soil adherence from carpet was 0.37+/-0.4 mg/cm(2), while the mean soil adherence from aluminum was 0.42+/-0.6 mg/cm(2). For aluminum, smaller soil particle size was associated with more transfer (p=0.0349), while for carpet, larger soil size was associated with more transfer (p<0.0001). Soil type was significant but only for aluminum surface, where sand was associated with higher adherence (p<0.0001). This data set can be used to improve estimates of dermal exposure to contaminants found in soils and dust present in indoor environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19215916     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2008.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  6 in total

1.  Determination of hand soil loading, soil transfer, and particle size variations after hand-pressing and hand-mouthing activities.

Authors:  Hsing-Cheng Hsi; Ching-Yao Hu; Ming-Chien Tsou; Han-Jung Hu; Halûk Özkaynak; Karen Bradham; Zeng-Yei Hseu; Winston Dang; Ling-Chu Chien
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Fungal pollution of indoor environments and its management.

Authors:  A A Haleem Khan; S Mohan Karuppayil
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Environmental Risk Factors in Patients with Noninvasive Fungal Sinusitis.

Authors:  Badr Eldin Mostafa; Mohammed M K El Sharnoubi; Hesham A A El-Sersy; Mohammed S M Mahmoud
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2016-05-04

4.  Risk Assessment for Children Exposed to Arsenic on Baseball Fields with Contaminated Fill Material.

Authors:  Alesia C Ferguson; Jennifer C Black; Isaac B Sims; Jennifer N Welday; Samir M Elmir; Kendra F Goff; J Mark Higginbotham; Helena M Solo-Gabriele
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Modeling Surface Disinfection Needs To Meet Microbial Risk Reduction Targets.

Authors:  Amanda M Wilson; Kelly A Reynolds; Jonathan D Sexton; Robert A Canales
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Particle transfer and adherence to human skin compared with cotton glove and pre-moistened polyvinyl alcohol exposure sampling substrates.

Authors:  Aleksandr B Stefaniak; Eleanor E Wade; Robert B Lawrence; Elizabeth D Arnold; M Abbas Virji
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.269

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.