Literature DB >> 1921522

The relationship of hospital characteristics and the results of peer review in six large states.

E M Kuhn1, A J Hartz, M S Gottlieb, A A Rimm.   

Abstract

To determine which characteristics of hospitals may be related to a higher quality of care, the association of hospital characteristics with the outcomes of medical record review by state Peer Review Organizations (PROs) was studied. The two data sources were: 1) the AHA 1986 Annual Survey of Hospitals and 2) reviews completed between July 1987 through June 1988 from six large PROs. For each hospital the percentage of cases that failed physician review (the confirmed problem rate) was computed. Hospital characteristics evaluated included financial status, ownership, medical training, technological sophistication, and size. The following characteristics were significantly associated with a lower confirmed problem rate: a higher occupancy rate, greater payroll expenses per bed, a higher proportion of physicians who were board-certified specialists, greater technological sophistication, a higher number of beds, a higher proportion of nurses who were registered, and membership in the Council of Teaching Hospitals. Public hospitals had higher problems rates than private not-for-profit hospitals. All characteristics significantly related to higher confirmed problem rates were also related to higher adjusted mortality rates in a previous study of 3,100 U.S. hospitals. The results suggest that hospital resources, including financial status, training of medical personnel, and availability of sophisticated equipment, are related to the quality of care provided by the hospital.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1921522     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199110000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  14 in total

1.  Effects of environmental threats on the quality of care in acute care hospitals.

Authors:  K I Youn; T T Wan
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 2.  Teaching hospitals and quality of care: a review of the literature.

Authors:  John Z Ayanian; Joel S Weissman
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  A longitudinal examination of hospital registered nurse staffing and quality of care.

Authors:  Barbara A Mark; David W Harless; Michael McCue; Yihua Xu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Quality of care: 1. What is quality and how can it be measured? Health Services Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Judging hospitals by severity-adjusted mortality rates: the influence of the severity-adjustment method.

Authors:  L I Iezzoni; A S Ash; M Shwartz; J Daley; J S Hughes; Y D Mackiernan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Association of Hospital Teaching Status with Neurosurgical Outcomes: An Instrumental Variable Analysis.

Authors:  Kimon Bekelis; Symeon Missios; Shannon Coy; Todd A MacKenzie
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 2.104

7.  Examining the validity of severity measures in today's health policy context.

Authors:  L I Iezzoni
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Quality of care and investment in property, plant, and equipment in hospitals.

Authors:  S W Levitt
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  The impact of center accreditation on hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT).

Authors:  S Marmor; J W Begun; J Abraham; B A Virnig
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 5.483

10.  The systematic assessment of variations in medical practices and their outcomes.

Authors:  H Krakauer; R C Bailey; H Cooper; W K Yu; K J Skellan; G Kattakkuzhy
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.