Literature DB >> 19215069

The electronic couplings in electron transfer and excitation energy transfer.

Chao-Ping Hsu1.   

Abstract

The transport of charge via electrons and the transport of excitation energy via excitons are two processes of fundamental importance in diverse areas of research. Characterization of electron transfer (ET) and excitation energy transfer (EET) rates are essential for a full understanding of, for instance, biological systems (such as respiration and photosynthesis) and opto-electronic devices (which interconvert electric and light energy). In this Account, we examine one of the parameters, the electronic coupling factor, for which reliable values are critical in determining transfer rates. Although ET and EET are different processes, many strategies for calculating the couplings share common themes. We emphasize the similarities in basic assumptions between the computational methods for the ET and EET couplings, examine the differences, and summarize the properties, advantages, and limits of the different computational methods. The electronic coupling factor is an off-diagonal Hamiltonian matrix element between the initial and final diabatic states in the transport processes. ET coupling is essentially the interaction of the two molecular orbitals (MOs) where the electron occupancy is changed. Singlet excitation energy transfer (SEET), however, contains a Frster dipole-dipole coupling as its most important constituent. Triplet excitation energy transfer (TEET) involves an exchange of two electrons of different spin and energy; thus, it is like an overlap interaction of two pairs of MOs. Strategies for calculating ET and EET couplings can be classified as (1) energy-gap-based approaches, (2) direct calculation of the off-diagonal matrix elements, or (3) use of an additional operator to describe the extent of charge or excitation localization and to calculate the coupling value. Some of the difficulties in calculating the couplings were recently resolved. Methods were developed to remove the nondynamical correlation problem from the highly precise coupled cluster models for ET coupling. It is now possible to obtain reliable ET couplings from entry-level excited-state Hamiltonians. A scheme to calculate the EET coupling in a general class of systems, regardless of the contributing terms, was also developed. In the past, empirically derived parameters were heavily invoked in model description of charge and excitation energy drifts in a solid-state device. Recent advances, including the methods described in this Account, permit the first-principle quantum mechanical characterization of one class of the parameters in such descriptions, enhancing the predictive power and allowing a deeper understanding of the systems involved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19215069     DOI: 10.1021/ar800153f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acc Chem Res        ISSN: 0001-4842            Impact factor:   22.384


  28 in total

Review 1.  Fluorescence lifetime measurements and biological imaging.

Authors:  Mikhail Y Berezin; Samuel Achilefu
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  An electro-optical and electron injection study of benzothiazole-based squaraine dyes as efficient dye-sensitized solar cell materials: a first principles study.

Authors:  Najat Saeed Al-Fahdan; Abdullah M Asiri; Ahmad Irfan; Salem A Basaif; Reda M El-Shishtawy
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 3.  DNA-multichromophore systems.

Authors:  Yin Nah Teo; Eric T Kool
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Long-range exciton dissociation in organic solar cells.

Authors:  Domenico Caruso; Alessandro Troisi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Predicting accurate electronic excitation transfer rates via marcus theory with Boys or Edmiston-Ruedenberg localized diabatization.

Authors:  Joseph E Subotnik; Josh Vura-Weis; Alex J Sodt; Mark A Ratner
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 2.781

6.  Quantum chemical study in the direction to design efficient donor-bridge-acceptor triphenylamine sensitizers with improved electron injection.

Authors:  Ahmad Irfan; Abdullah G Al-Sehemi
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  Combined UMC- DFT prediction of electron-hole coupling in unit cells of pentacene crystals.

Authors:  Luciano Almeida Leal; Rafael Timóteo de Souza Júnior; Antonio Luciano de Almeida Fonseca; Luiz Antonio Ribeiro Junior; Stefan Blawid; Demetrio Antonio da Silva Filho; Wiliam Ferreira da Cunha
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 1.810

8.  Hole Hopping through Cytochrome P450.

Authors:  Mette L H Sørensen; Brian C Sanders; L Perry Hicks; Maria H Rasmussen; Andreas L Vishart; Jacob Kongsted; Jay R Winkler; Harry B Gray; Thorsten Hansen
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Charge localization and charge transfer in the Bebq2 monomer and dimer.

Authors:  Andrei A Safonov; Alexander A Bagaturyants
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 1.810

10.  Accurate Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanical Calculations of Reduction Potentials in Azurin Variants.

Authors:  Lin Shen; Xiancheng Zeng; Hao Hu; Xiangqian Hu; Weitao Yang
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.