Literature DB >> 19215003

Would different routine precordial electrode positions be more useful? Answer: not likely.

J Willis Hurst1.   

Abstract

There are reasons to wonder if the current precordial electrode positions are the best ones to study the electrical forces of the heart. Theoretically, more horizontal electrode positions and several superior and inferior electrode positions that are perpendicular to the horizontally placed electrode positions should make a superior lead system. A study was designed to determine if that was true. The result of the study indicated that such a system did not solve all of the problems that were posed by the current system. Although the new system was easier to use, the findings did not justify a change from the presently used system of precordial electrode placement.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19215003      PMCID: PMC6653719          DOI: 10.1002/clc.20472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cardiol        ISSN: 0160-9289            Impact factor:   2.882


  1 in total

Review 1.  Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part I: The electrocardiogram and its technology: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society: endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology.

Authors:  Paul Kligfield; Leonard S Gettes; James J Bailey; Rory Childers; Barbara J Deal; E William Hancock; Gerard van Herpen; Jan A Kors; Peter Macfarlane; David M Mirvis; Olle Pahlm; Pentti Rautaharju; Galen S Wagner; Mark Josephson; Jay W Mason; Peter Okin; Borys Surawicz; Hein Wellens
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 29.690

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.