Sara F L Kirk1, C Lisa Cramm, Sheri L Price, Tarra L Penney, Lorraine Jarvie, Hilda Power. 1. Canada Research Chair in Health Services Research, Applied Research Collaborations for Health (ARCH), School of Health Administration, Dalhousie University, 1318 Robie Street, Halifax B3H 3E2, NS, Canada. Sara.Kirk@dal.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this survey was to gain insight into the status of birthing facilities across Atlantic Canada regarding obesity management. Specifically, we were interested in learning about the reported number of obese women entering birthing facilities, if body mass index (BMI) was determined from weight and height, and whether this was used to diagnose maternal obesity or not. Clinical, delivery, or equipment-related challenges and the state of existing or planned policies or guidelines specific to this high-risk population were also sought. METHODS: An online, cross-sectional survey (audit), distributed via email to key staff members at birthing facilities in Atlantic Canada, including nurse managers, nurse practitioners, registered staff nurses and obstetrician-gynecologists. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-two responses were received from 38 invitees (57% response rate), representing half the birthing facilities in Atlantic Canada. Despite the fact that the majority of facilities recorded maternal height and pre-pregnancy weight upon admission, these measurements were not used to calculate and document maternal BMI, nor to make a diagnosis of maternal obesity. More troubling, no birthing facilities in our survey had guidelines or care plans in place to deal with this high-risk population, and two-thirds of those surveyed had no plans for their creation in the near future. While maternal obesity was considered a problem, a third of respondents reported no direct access to properly sized lifts or transfer devices in their units. This study provides a useful baseline for monitoring improvements in the care of obese women giving birth in Atlantic Canada.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this survey was to gain insight into the status of birthing facilities across Atlantic Canada regarding obesity management. Specifically, we were interested in learning about the reported number of obesewomen entering birthing facilities, if body mass index (BMI) was determined from weight and height, and whether this was used to diagnose maternal obesity or not. Clinical, delivery, or equipment-related challenges and the state of existing or planned policies or guidelines specific to this high-risk population were also sought. METHODS: An online, cross-sectional survey (audit), distributed via email to key staff members at birthing facilities in Atlantic Canada, including nurse managers, nurse practitioners, registered staff nurses and obstetrician-gynecologists. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-two responses were received from 38 invitees (57% response rate), representing half the birthing facilities in Atlantic Canada. Despite the fact that the majority of facilities recorded maternal height and pre-pregnancy weight upon admission, these measurements were not used to calculate and document maternal BMI, nor to make a diagnosis of maternal obesity. More troubling, no birthing facilities in our survey had guidelines or care plans in place to deal with this high-risk population, and two-thirds of those surveyed had no plans for their creation in the near future. While maternal obesity was considered a problem, a third of respondents reported no direct access to properly sized lifts or transfer devices in their units. This study provides a useful baseline for monitoring improvements in the care of obesewomen giving birth in Atlantic Canada.
Authors: Luiz Carlos Seligman; Bruce Bartholow Duncan; Leandro Branchtein; Dea Suzana Miranda Gaio; Sotero Serrate Mengue; Maria Inês Schmidt Journal: Rev Saude Publica Date: 2006-06-23 Impact factor: 2.106
Authors: David B Sarwer; Kelly C Allison; Lauren M Gibbons; Jessica Tuttman Markowitz; Deborah B Nelson Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2006 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Susan Y Chu; Shin Y Kim; Joseph Lau; Christopher H Schmid; Patricia M Dietz; William M Callaghan; Kathryn M Curtis Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: M Graff; A S Richardson; K L Young; A L Mazul; Heather Highland; K E North; K L Mohlke; L A Lange; E M Lange; K M Harris; P Gordon-Larsen Journal: Health Place Date: 2016-10-20 Impact factor: 4.078