Literature DB >> 19214679

A new grading system to evaluate the risk of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Ina Zuber-Jerger1, Esther Endlicher, Frank Kullmann, Cornelia M Gelbmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to develop a system to grade the risk of the procedures summarized under the term endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
METHODS: In a controlled prospective study, we evaluated the early complications of ERCP in 526 consecutive patients at a single endoscopy center in a defined period. The relation between endoscopic procedures and related complications was analyzed for significance. A grading system based on significant risk factors and clinical implications was developed.
RESULTS: Of the ERCP procedures, 29% were diagnostic and 71% therapeutic. A total of 45 complications occurred in 42 patients: pancreatitis (2%), perforation (1%), cardiorespiratory problems (0.6%), stent-related complications (0.5%), leakages (1.5%), and bleeding (3%). A native papilla was a significant risk factor for the development of complications (P = 0.046). On the basis of these findings, we defined five groups of ERCP-related complications: nonnative papillae with either diagnostic (A) or therapeutic interventions (B); native papillae with diagnostic (C) or therapeutic (D) interventions; and special therapeutic interventions (E). Complication rates differed significantly between individual groups, A versus D (P = 0.013), A versus E (P = 0.010), B versus D (P = 0.005), and B versus E (P = 0.003), as well as between A/B and C/D (P = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: A grading system based on differentiating between native and nonnative papillae and diagnostic versus therapeutic procedures demonstrated significantly different complication rates. This grading system has the potential to predict the risk of ERCP-related complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19214679     DOI: 10.1007/s00535-008-2295-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0944-1174            Impact factor:   7.527


  14 in total

1.  Grading ERCPs by degree of difficulty: a new concept to produce more meaningful outcome data.

Authors:  S M Schutz; R M Abbott
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  E Masci; G Toti; A Mariani; S Curioni; A Lomazzi; M Dinelli; G Minoli; C Crosta; U Comin; A Fertitta; A Prada; G R Passoni; P A Testoni
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  S Loperfido; G Angelini; G Benedetti; F Chilovi; F Costan; F De Berardinis; M De Bernardin; A Ederle; P Fina; A Fratton
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 4.  Appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy: risk of complications.

Authors:  F Froehlich; J J Gonvers; J P Vader; R W Dubois; B Burnand
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  Outcomes of endoscopy procedures: struggling towards definitions.

Authors:  P B Cotton
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study.

Authors:  M L Freeman; J A DiSario; D B Nelson; M B Fennerty; J G Lee; D J Bjorkman; C S Overby; J Aas; M E Ryan; G S Bochna; M J Shaw; H W Snady; R V Erickson; J P Moore; J P Roel
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Vagal withdrawal during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  M Christensen; V Rasmussen; S Schulze; J Rosenberg
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Are complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy age related?

Authors:  G T Deans; P Sedman; D F Martin; C M Royston; C K Leow; W E Thomas; W A Brough
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Complications of ERCP: a prospective study.

Authors:  Merete Christensen; Peter Matzen; Svend Schulze; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP.

Authors:  Jo Vandervoort; Roy M Soetikno; Tony C K Tham; Richard C K Wong; Angelo P Ferrari; Henry Montes; Alfred D Roston; Adam Slivka; David R Lichtenstein; Frederick W Ruymann; Jacques Van Dam; Mike Hughes; David L Carr-Locke
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  2 in total

1.  Use of diffusion-weighted imaging in the noninvasive diagnostic of obstructed biliary ducts.

Authors:  Eliane Donato Leite Paro; Andrea Puchnick; Jacob Szejnfeld; Suzan Menasce Goldman
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-07-14

2.  Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiography compared to operative endoscopy in detecting biliary stones, a single center experience and review of literature.

Authors:  Francesco A Polistina; Mauro Frego; Marco Bisello; Emy Manzi; Antonella Vardanega; Bortolo Perin
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-04-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.