Literature DB >> 19213102

Oral cytology revisited.

R Mehrotra1, M Hullmann, R Smeets, T E Reichert, O Driemel.   

Abstract

During the last decade, oral cytology has once again become the focus of scientific research. This new interest is due to the introduction of a cytobrush for cell collection as well as a computer-assisted analysis (Oral CDx). Although promising, the sensitivity and specificity of conventional oral brush cytology remains limited. To circumvent the problems and improve the accuracy, various adjunctive analytical methods have been attempted. DNA analysis, immunocytochemical and molecular analysis are suggested methodological cytology approaches to improve the validity of oral brush cytology. An increase in sensitivity (up to 100%) and specificity (up to 100%) of oral brush biopsy has been reported on localized pre-malignant and malignant lesions. Oral brush biopsy probably will not replace histopathology in the definitive diagnosis of oral cancer, but it might be valuable for the prevention of misdiagnosis of clinically doubtful oral lesions and for the monitoring of lesions that might proceed on to oral cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19213102     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2008.00709.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Pathol Med        ISSN: 0904-2512            Impact factor:   4.253


  17 in total

1.  Oral chronic graft-versus-host disease: report from the International Consensus Conference on clinical practice in cGVHD.

Authors:  Johannes K-H Meier; Daniel Wolff; Steve Pavletic; Hildegard Greinix; Martin Gosau; Hartmut Bertz; Stefanie J Lee; Anita Lawitschka; Sharon Elad
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Oral rinse as a simpler approach to exfoliative cytology: a comparative study.

Authors:  Shaila Mulki; Pushparaj Shetty; Prakash Pai
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-12-15

3.  Examination of human meibum collection and extraction techniques.

Authors:  Kristina M Haworth; Jason J Nichols; Mirunalni Thangavelu; Loraine T Sinnott; Kelly K Nichols
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 4.  Exciting new advances in oral cancer diagnosis: avenues to early detection.

Authors:  Ravi Mehrotra; Dwijendra K Gupta
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2011-07-28

5.  Applications of OralCDx® methodology in the diagnosis of oral leukoplakia.

Authors:  Flavio Seijas-Naya; Tamara García-Carnicero; Pilar Gándara-Vila; Elena Couso-Folgueiras; Mario Pérez-Sayáns; Rafael Gándara-Vila; Abel García-García; José-Manuel Gándara-Rey
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-01-01

6.  The efficacy of oral brush biopsy with computer-assisted analysis in identifying precancerous and cancerous lesions.

Authors:  Ravi Mehrotra; Sanjay Mishra; Mamta Singh; Mangal Singh
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2011-08-24

7.  Salivary markers for oral cancer detection.

Authors:  Anastasios K Markopoulos; Evangelia Z Michailidou; Georgios Tzimagiorgis
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2010-08-27

8.  Techniques for precancerous lesion diagnosis.

Authors:  Sarah Freygang Mendes; Grasieli de Oliveira Ramos; Elena Riet Correa Rivero; Filipe Modolo; Liliane Janete Grando; Maria Inês Meurer
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 4.375

9.  MAGE-A as a novel approach in the diagnostic accuracy of oral squamous cell cancer: a case report.

Authors:  Philipp Metzler; Nur Mollaoglu; Stephan Schwarz; Friedrich W Neukam; Emeka Nkenke; Jutta Ries
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2009-12-16

10.  Leishman Giemsa cocktail as a new, potentially useful cytological technique comparable to Papanicolaou staining for oral cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Ui Belgaumi; P Shetty
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.