Literature DB >> 19213020

Performance measurement in mental health care: present situation and future possibilities.

Irma J Baars1, Silvia M A A Evers, Arnoud Arntz, Godefridus G van Merode.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: This paper describes performance measurement and its indicators for mental health care services. Performance measurement can serve several goals such as accountability, quality improvement and performance management. For all three purposes structure, process and outcome indicators should be measured. Literature was retrieved from Medline and PsychInfo in order to see which performance indicators were used for the three purposes of performance measurement in mental health care. The indicators were classified in structure, process and outcome indicators. The results show no big differences in the indicators used among studies. Performance management is the performance measurement purpose most referred to, followed by accountability, and quality improvement. Outcome and process indicators are used most, structure indicators are in the minority. Several levels of measurement, that is national or service level, came forward in the literature review. To overcome misinterpretation of data and to be able to improve quality and manage performances, performance indicator sets should refer to structure, process and outcome. Indicators should be chosen carefully with the aim of the measurement taken into mind. Based on this review, a conceptual framework is presented to support managers in their decisions about which indictors can best be used for performance measurement. Additionally, a model that provides an understanding of the use of information gained by performance measurement is given. Copyright (c) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19213020     DOI: 10.1002/hpm.951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Plann Manage        ISSN: 0749-6753


  7 in total

Review 1.  Outcomes management: incorporating and sustaining processes critical to using outcome data to guide practice improvement.

Authors:  Kay Hodges; James R Wotring
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  Assessing the Quality and Value of Psychological Health Care in Civilian Health Plans: Lessons and Implications for the Military Health System.

Authors:  Grant R Martsolf; Karen Chan Osilla; Daniel Mandel; Kimberly A Hepner; Carrie M Farmer
Journal:  Rand Health Q       Date:  2016-05-09

3.  Call for information, call for quality in mental health care.

Authors:  A Lora
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 6.892

4.  Nursing-sensitive indicators: a concept analysis.

Authors:  Liza Heslop; Sai Lu; Xiaoquan Xu
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  The Effectiveness of Home Services in Taiwan: A People-Centered Approach.

Authors:  Li-Fan Liu; Wei-Ming Wang; Yi-Jung Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Primary health Centres' performance assessment measures in developing countries: review of the empirical literature.

Authors:  R Bangalore Sathyananda; A de Rijk; U Manjunath; A Krumeich; C P van Schayck
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 7.  Performance Measurement in Mental Health and Addictions Systems: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Karen Urbanoski; Dakota Inglis
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs Suppl       Date:  2019-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.