Literature DB >> 19212956

Perspectives for imaging mass spectrometry in the proteomics landscape.

Luke MacAleese1, Jonathan Stauber, Ron M A Heeren.   

Abstract

A number of techniques are used in the field of proteomics that can be combined to get the most molecular information from a specific biological sample, fluid or tissue. Imaging techniques are often used to obtain local information from tissue samples. However, imaging experiments are often staining experiments, which rely on specific or aspecific interactions between fluorescent markers and pre-defined (families of) peptide or protein. Therefore, imaging is often used as a screening or validation tool for the local presence of proteins that have been identified by other means. Imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) combines the advantages of MS and microscopy in a single experiment. It is a technique that does not require any labeling of the analytes and provides a high multiplexing capability combined with the potential for analyte identification. It enables simultaneous detection of potentially all peptides and proteins present at a tissue surface and is used for the determination and identification of tissue-specific disease markers. The workflows of IMS experiments closely resemble those of conventional proteomics. In this review, we describe IMS experiments step-by-step to position and evaluate the role of IMS in a comparative proteomics landscape. We illustrate in a concise review that IMS is a true discovery oriented tool for proteomics that seamlessly integrates in conventional proteomics workflows and can be perceived as either an alternative or complementary proteomics technique.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19212956     DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200800363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics        ISSN: 1615-9853            Impact factor:   3.984


  20 in total

Review 1.  Using proteomics to study sexual reproduction in angiosperms.

Authors:  Ján A Miernyk; Anna Preťová; Adela Olmedilla; Katarína Klubicová; Bohuš Obert; Martin Hajduch
Journal:  Sex Plant Reprod       Date:  2010-09-10

Review 2.  Mass spectrometric imaging for biomedical tissue analysis.

Authors:  Kamila Chughtai; Ron M A Heeren
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Revisiting rat spermatogenesis with MALDI imaging at 20-microm resolution.

Authors:  Mélanie Lagarrigue; Michael Becker; Régis Lavigne; Sören-Oliver Deininger; Axel Walch; Florence Aubry; Detlev Suckau; Charles Pineau
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 4.  Molecular mass spectrometry imaging in biomedical and life science research.

Authors:  Jaroslav Pól; Martin Strohalm; Vladimír Havlíček; Michael Volný
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 4.304

5.  Imaging mass spectrometry: hype or hope?

Authors:  Ron M A Heeren; Donald F Smith; Jonathan Stauber; Basak Kükrer-Kaletas; Luke MacAleese
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 6.  Mass spectrometry imaging, an emerging technology in neuropsychopharmacology.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Shariatgorji; Per Svenningsson; Per E Andrén
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 7.  MALDI imaging mass spectrometry for direct tissue analysis: technological advancements and recent applications.

Authors:  Benjamin Balluff; Cedrik Schöne; Heinz Höfler; Axel Walch
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 4.304

8.  iTRAQ Quantitative Proteomic Profiling and MALDI-MSI of Colon Cancer Spheroids Treated with Combination Chemotherapies in a 3D Printed Fluidic Device.

Authors:  Gabriel J LaBonia; Katelyn R Ludwig; C Bruce Mousseau; Amanda B Hummon
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Integrated molecular imaging reveals tissue heterogeneity driving host-pathogen interactions.

Authors:  James E Cassat; Jessica L Moore; Kevin J Wilson; Zach Stark; Boone M Prentice; Raf Van de Plas; William J Perry; Yaofang Zhang; John Virostko; Daniel C Colvin; Kristie L Rose; Audra M Judd; Michelle L Reyzer; Jeffrey M Spraggins; Caroline M Grunenwald; John C Gore; Richard M Caprioli; Eric P Skaar
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 17.956

10.  Drug penetration and metabolism in 3D cell cultures treated in a 3D printed fluidic device: assessment of irinotecan via MALDI imaging mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Gabriel J LaBonia; Sarah Y Lockwood; Andrew A Heller; Dana M Spence; Amanda B Hummon
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.