OBJECTIVE: Our objective in this retrospective study was to assess the hippocampal abnormalities, associate them with various congenital brain malformations, and define the frequency of the association in specific anomaly subgroups. METHODS: A total of 62 patients with congenital malformations of the brain who had thin-slice coronal T2-weighted, fluid attenuated inversion recovery, IR, or T1-weighted 3D gradient echo images were retrospectively evaluated for the type of congenital brain malformation and morphological or rotational hippocampal abnormalities. Medical records were reviewed for age, sex, and symptoms. CONCLUSION: Hippocampal abnormalities are found in 55.8% of all patients with different kinds of congenital brain malformations that are mostly associated with cortical dysplasia, lissencephaly, and total agenesis of the corpus callosum. The severity of the injury may have an effect on the extent of the involvement of the brain.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective in this retrospective study was to assess the hippocampal abnormalities, associate them with various congenital brain malformations, and define the frequency of the association in specific anomaly subgroups. METHODS: A total of 62 patients with congenital malformations of the brain who had thin-slice coronal T2-weighted, fluid attenuated inversion recovery, IR, or T1-weighted 3D gradient echo images were retrospectively evaluated for the type of congenital brain malformation and morphological or rotational hippocampal abnormalities. Medical records were reviewed for age, sex, and symptoms. CONCLUSION:Hippocampal abnormalities are found in 55.8% of all patients with different kinds of congenital brain malformations that are mostly associated with cortical dysplasia, lissencephaly, and total agenesis of the corpus callosum. The severity of the injury may have an effect on the extent of the involvement of the brain.
Authors: A Righini; S Zirpoli; C Parazzini; E Bianchini; P Scifo; C Sala; F Triulzi Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2006 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: M Baulac; N De Grissac; D Hasboun; C Oppenheim; C Adam; A Arzimanoglou; F Semah; S Lehéricy; S Clémenceau; B Berger Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: M A Montenegro; D Kinay; F Cendes; A Bernasconi; N Bernasconi; A C Coan; L M Li; M M Guerreiro; C A M Guerreiro; I Lopes-Cendes; E Andermann; F Dubeau; F Andermann Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: S Lehéricy; D Dormont; F Sémah; S Clémenceau; O Granat; C Marsault; M Baulac Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1995-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Deanne K Thompson; Christopher Adamson; Gehan Roberts; Nathan Faggian; Stephen J Wood; Simon K Warfield; Lex W Doyle; Peter J Anderson; Gary F Egan; Terrie E Inder Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-01-04 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Thomas R Henry; Marie Chupin; Stéphane Lehéricy; John P Strupp; Michael A Sikora; Zhiyi Y Sha; Kâmil Ugurbil; Pierre-François Van de Moortele Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-07-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Gordana Juric-Sekhar; Raj P Kapur; Ian A Glass; Mitzi L Murray; Shawn E Parnell; Robert F Hevner Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2010-09-21 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Naoko Shiba; Ray A M Daza; Lisa G Shaffer; A James Barkovich; William B Dobyns; Robert F Hevner Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun Date: 2013-08-02 Impact factor: 7.801