Literature DB >> 19212502

Impact of insurance scheme on adults' dental check-ups in a developing oral health care system.

Fariborz Bayat1, Miira M Vehkalahti, A Hamid Zafarmand, Heikki Tala.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To find out the relationship between dental insurance and demand for dental care, the present study evaluated impact of insurance scheme on adults' dental check-ups in a developing oral health care system.
METHODS: The target population included adults in the city of Tehran where the only telecommunication company provides 90% of the 1.9 million households with a fixed telephone. Of the 1531 subjects who answered the phone call, 224 were outside the target age (under 18), 67 said that they never had visited a dentist, and 221 refused to respond, leaving 1019 subjects in the final sample. Each interview lasted 15 minutes and was carried out using a structured questionnaire with fixed and open-ended questions.
RESULTS: 71% of the subjects reported having dental insurance and 16% having visited a dentist for a check-up; 55%, more women than men, reported having had a dental visit within the past 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The present results revealed the positive relationship between insurance and demand for dental care. Those having dental insurance were more likely to go to check-ups despite their generally low rate found in this country with a developing oral health care system. In such countries, health insurance schemes should therefore include obligatory regular dental check-ups to emphasize prevention-oriented dental care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adults; Demand; Dental check-ups; Dental insurance; Dental visit

Year:  2008        PMID: 19212502      PMCID: PMC2633147     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Dent


INTRODUCTION

The reason to visit a dentist is regarded as one of the measures of demand since it is the users who determine the action.1 As reviewed by Bendall,2 dental insurance is positively related to the demand for dental care. In comparison with the non-insured subjects, those with dental insurance visit a dentist more regularly3–6 and have frequent dental check-ups.7–10 As part of preventive health behavior,11 dental check-ups are commonly recommended.12–15 Generally, health behavior is affected by individual characteristics, such as age, gender, and level of education but also by the characteristics of the oral health care system, such as availability of third party payment options.16 Depending on the social and political system of each country, the health policy, oral health services, and their funding can support preventive oral health behavior in populations by encouraging checkups, emphasizing preventative orientation of the dental services, and applying third party payment systems. In the pure model of secondary prevention, regular check-ups have two purposes: to reduce the burden of illness by accurate detection of disease at its early stage and to treat the disease effectively in order to alter its natural course or progression.17–18 Policy in most of the Scandinavian countries, in the UK, and the Netherlands emphasizes regular dental check-ups for all.6,8,20,22–23 In developed countries, the rates of annual check-ups for adults range from 54% to 92%,20,22–25 but even higher rates of dental check-ups have been reported for people with private dental insurance.8–10,24 In many developing countries, dental care systems focus on treatment and relief of pain.25–28 Treatment-oriented national insurance systems may discourage preventive use of oral health services.29 Thus, patterns of adults’ behavior for dental check-ups according to insurance status may differ from those in developed countries with prevention-oriented health insurance programs. To find out the relationship between dental insurance and demand for dental care, the present study evaluated impact of insurance scheme on adults’ dental check-ups in a developing oral health care system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Background

Table 1 describes the health insurance system in Iran. The main function of both public and commercial insurance is to cover the costs of treatments; neither scheme has any obligation to attend dental check-ups. Public insurance covers 50% of Iran’s population, and commercial insurance almost 10% of the employees.30 The dentist-population ratio in Tehran is 1:1800, with around 1300 dentists who are hired by or have contracted with insurance schemes.30–33
Table 1

Description of dental insurance system in Iran.

Aspects of insurancePublic insuranceCommercial insurance
FundingPremium: 70% by the employer, 30% by the employeePremium: by the employer as fringe benefits
Reimbursement to dentistMonthly salaryFee-for-service payment under a fixed- fee quotation
Access and restrictionsAvailable at the clinics owned (n=19) by or contracted (n=160) with public insurance.Available at clinics contracted with commercial insurance (n=300).
Restricted to basic dental services.No restriction by type of dental services. Annual ceiling for the reimbursement.
Target populationObligatory for all employees (and their family members) under the labour act.Employees (and their family members) of commercial enterprises.
Population coverageAbout 50%Less than 10%
Dentist-population ratio11:30001:1100

Estimates based on data provided by statistical center of Iran (1), Social security (2) and, Medical service insurance organization (3), and Medical council of Iran (4).

Design and sampling

The Iranian Centre for Dental Research granted ethical approval for the present study, which was based on cross-sectional data obtained through phone interviews. The target population included adults in the city of Tehran where the only telecommunication company provides 90% of the 1.9 million households with a fixed telephone. A pilot study in February 2005 on the sampling method showed its feasibility. Then, a total of 3200 seven-digit numbers were randomly selected from a list of four million computerized options resembling real phone numbers.

Phone calls

Four trained interviewers made the phone calls. The outcome of each successful call was recorded as the duration of the interview and of a missed call as the reason for failure (busy, no answer, fax, and non-connected lines). After five attempts, a busy or non-answering line was omitted from the list. In total, 1669 phone numbers were unavailable, most because of being for a non-connected line or fax.

Interviewing and questions

Each interview lasted 15 minutes and was carried out using a structured questionnaire with fixed and open-ended questions. The questions were based on related recent studies.29,34–35 The first question asked for the respondent’s date of birth, later calculated as the respondent’s age to the nearest year. The answers to the question about insurance status were recorded as: No insurance, Public insurance, or Commercial insurance. For the question “What was the reason for your last dental visit?”, the answer was recorded as: Check-up, Trouble with teeth or gums, Continuing dental treatment, and Never visited a dentist. In the analyses, the very rare cases who responded that they were continuing their treatment (mostly a root canal treatment or fixed prosthetics) were combined into the category of Trouble with teeth or gums. Those who said that they had never visited a dentist were excluded. Consequently, the reason for the dental visit was dichotomized as Check-up or Trouble. Utilization of dental services was inquired as the number of dental visits within past 12 months and was recorded as: No visit, One, Two, Three, Four and more, and I do not remember. For the analysis, the latter option with very rare cases (1.3%) was taken as No dental visit. For the cross-tabulation, number of dental visits was categorized as: None, One, Two and more. The respondent’s level of education was recorded using six options, later combined into three: Low (illiterate, primary or secondary school), Medium (high school or diploma), and High (associate degree, bachelor’s degree, master degree). Information about family income was obtained with the open question “How much is your monthly household income?” the answers were recorded as an amount of Rials and then categorized into Low (under the poverty line), Medium, and High.

Statistical analysis

Evaluation of the statistical significance of the differences between the subgroups included the Chi-squared test for frequencies and ANOVA for comparison of mean values. The strength of the factors related to a dental check-up visit for was evaluated by fitting a logistic regression model to the data and by calculating the corresponding odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Goodness of fit was evaluated by means of the Hosmer and Lemeshow test. Of the 1531 subjects who answered the phone call, 224 were outside the target age (under 18), 67 said that they never had visited a dentist, and 221 refused to respond, leaving 1019 subjects in the final sample. Their age pattern approximates the age distribution of the target population.36

RESULTS

Of the subjects (n=1019), 58% were women and 61% were under 35 years of age. The distribution by age was similar for men and women (P=0.28). Subjects’ mean age was 32.9 years (SD=10.7; median 32.0: 95% CI=32.2–33.5), with no gender differences (P=0.18). Of all, 71% reported having dental insurance and 16% having visited a dentist for a check-up; 55%, more women than men, reported having had a dental visit within the past 12 months. Table 2 illustrates the rates of respondents reporting check-up as the reason for their most recent dental visit, and having two and more dental visits within last 12 months, according to their characteristics. The highest rates for checkups occurred in the youngest age groups: 24% for men (P<.001) and 22% for women (P=0.02), among those with a higher or medium level of education (P<.001), and those with commercial insurance (P<.01). Household income showed no impact on reporting dental check-ups.
Table 2

Percentages of adults (1019) reporting a check-up as the reason for their most recent dental visit and having had at least two visits within the past 12 months according to their characteristics, separately for men (n=429) and women (n=590), in Tehran, Iran.

CharacteristicsCheck-ups (%)≥2 dental visits (%)

MenWomenAllMenWomenAll
Age group
 18–24242223243429
 25–34161918343333
 35–4491110283230
 45 +4118143124
 P value<0.0010.02<0.001<0.0010.52<0.001
Level of education
 Low565121917
 Medium171717233228
 High172320384240
 P value0.03<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
Household income1
 Low41611173025
 Medium161415273129
 High181918324438
 P value0.080.540.210.20<0.001<0.001
Dental insurance status
 No-insurance121413232625
 Public insurance161616283431
 Commercial insurance253128364742
 P value0.170.050.010.660.050.03

Statistical evaluation in frequencies by means of the Chi square test.

1 No answer by 269 respondents.

With no gender difference, 30% of the respondents reported having had two and more visits within the past 12 months. That was most common among 25- to 34-year-olds (P<.001), among those with high level of education and income (P<.001), and among those with commercial insurance (P=0.03). Among those subjects who had at least one dental visit within the past 12 months, number of visits was slightly higher for women than men (2.1 v.s. 2.0; P=0.05). Table 3 shows mean numbers of dental visits according to the respondents’ characteristics. Higher numbers of dental visits were found for those with a high level of education (P<.001) and those with commercial insurance (P=0.05).
Table 3

Mean number of dental visits among those adults who have at least one dental visit within last 12 months (n=562), separately for men (n=225) and women (n=337).

CharacteristicsMean number of visits

AllMenWomen

Mean (SD)Mean (SD)Mean (SD)P value
Age group
 18–242.0 (1.2)1.8 (1.1)2.1 (1.2)
 25–342.1 (1.2)2.0 (1.1)2.2 (1.2)0.65
 35–442.2 (1.2)2.2 (1.2)2.2 (1.2)
 45 +2.1 (1.1)1.7 (1.0)2.2 (1.2)
Level of education
 Low1.8 (1.1)1.6 (1.1)1.9 (1.2)
 Medium2.0 (1.2)1.8 (1.0)2.2 (1.2)<0.001
 High2.3 (1.2)2.3 (1.1)2.3 (1.2)
Household income1
 Low2.2 (1.2)1.2 (1.1)2.3 (1.2)
 Medium2.0 (1.2)2.0 (1.1)2.1 (1.2)0.80
 High2.1 (1.2)2.0 (1.1)2.3 (1.2)
Dental insurance status
 No-insurance2.0 (1.1)1.8 (1.0)2.0 (1.2)
 Public insurance2.1 (1.2)2.0 (1.1)2.1 (1.2)0.05
 Commercial insurance2.2 (1.2)2.1 (1.1)2.3 (1.2)

Statistical evaluation for comparison of mean values by ANOVA.

1No answer by 139 respondents

In a multivariable analysis household income as a co-variable revealed no impact and was omitted from the further analysis. The level of education, the type of insurance, and number of dental visits appeared as the main explanatory factors for subjects’ dental check-ups in the final logistic regression analysis (Table 4), which simultaneously controls for all factors included. The model indicated that those with a medium (OR=2.6) or high (OR=3.3) level of education, and with commercial insurance (OR=2.4) were more likely to go to a dentist for a check-up. The model fitted the data well (P=0.62).
Table 4

Factors related to reporting that a check-up was the reason for most recent dental visit, as explained by means of a logistic regression model fitted to the data on adults reporting a dental visit (n=1019) in Tehran, Iran.

ParametersES*SEPORCI 95%
 Age−0.040.01<0.0011.00.9 – 1.0
 Gender0.170.180.351.20.8 – 1.7
Level of education
 Low1.0
 Medium0.940.36<0.0012.61.3 – 5.2
 High1.200.36<0.0013.31.6 – 6.7
Type of insurance
 Non- insured1.0
 Public insurance0.220.210.371.30.8 – 1.9
 Commercial insurance0.900.350.012.41.3 – 4.7
Dental visit within last 12 months
 No1.0
 Yes0.400.180.051.41.0 – 2.0

Goodness-of-fit by Hosmer and Lemeshow test. p=0.62

Estimate of strength

DISCUSSION

Only 16% of our respondents gave a check-up as the reason for their most recent dental visit. In comparison with developed countries, this is far from the recommended way to use dental services. In Netherlands, almost all insured patients (92%), both public and private, reported that they had visited a dentist for a check-up within the past 12 months.20 High or moderate check-up rates have been reported for the USA, 78%,8 Finland, 57%,35 Australia, 53%37 and Japan, 46%.13 In the UK, 62% of adults report having had a dental check-up within the previous 12 months, the figures being clearly higher for those under the NHS (46%) compared to 14% for the non-NHS subjects.38 The behavior of visiting a dentist regularly for check-ups has its origins in one’s childhood. In addition, the health policy and the characteristics of the oral health care system in a community create and maintain circumstances favorable to such behavior. One important and effective way to promote this behavior has been school-based dental care, where children visit a dentist for check-ups at regular intervals. Studies have shown that this preventive behavior seems to continue into adulthood.29,39–40 Consequently, in those countries with higher rates for dental check-ups, school-based dental care programs have long dominated.41 In Iran, the public health services offer dental care to school children up to 12 years of age.42 The fact that this care does not include regular dental check-ups is probably reflected in the present adults’ check-up behavior as well. Those insurance health systems with prevention-oriented features and an obligation to regular dental check-ups have resulted into higher rates of check-ups.7 The very low rates of checkups in the present study certainly reflect the nature of the health delivery system. Unfortunately, Iran has a treatment-oriented health care system where patients usually make a dental visit when they have trouble with their teeth or gums. The policies of either public or commercial insurance include no obligation to attend regular dental check-ups. In our study, having a commercial insurance had a strong impact on attendance at dental checkups. This is in line with findings from countries with predominantly private insurance schemes and high rates of dental check-ups.7–10,22,47 In Iran, commercial insurance is employer-sponsored, and dental services are offered to employees and their families as fringe benefits. These benefits are supposed to be used annually. For our adults, the ceiling of the annual remuneration by the insurance seemed to have led to symptom-based care rather than to regular dental check-ups. The strong relationships we observed between dental check-ups and levels of education have also been found by several other studies. In Iran, those who have a high or medium level of education are usually employed, and they also tend to have higher income. That factor again, by itself, is associated with higher demand for dental care. In addition, people with higher education and income are more likely to have a dental insurance as a benefit. Although recommendations regarding optimal recall intervals vary between countries and dental health care systems, general dental practitioners in many developed countries have traditionally advocated six-monthly dental check-ups.14 It can be assumed that rather many people with a high or medium level of education value their oral health and would follow dentist recommendations on regular check-ups. Based on the present low rates for check-ups, it seems that Iranian dentists have not adopted recalls in their everyday practice. Disparities in the rates of dental check-ups according to gender and age were observed in the bivariate analyses, but these differences disappeared when controlled for in the logistic regression analyses. That gender was not correlated with dental check-up rates is an interesting finding in view of the frequent reports of higher demand for dental care among women.13,20,22,37,38 However, in our study population, more women than men reported a dental visit within the past 12 months. In the present study, variation in numbers of dental visits within the past 12 months showed that level of education is associated with utilization. A wider evaluation of factors related to utilization of dental services could benefit of data of expenditures of oral health care. Unfortunately such information is not available for Iran. Nevertheless, the total expenditures of health in Iran are 6.6% of GDP (6.0% in 2001).43 In addition, according to the Iran National Health Account, 18% of health expenditures are paid by health insurance, 23% by government and the rest is paid out-of-pocket.44 In the present study, convenience of the interviewers and respondents and access to the vast majority of the target population (90%) were the important aspects for selecting the phone interview method. In addition, that is a cost-efficient method of data collection in area where the telephone system is well developed with a high coverage and cheap calls. Validity of such method for general and oral health research has been verified in several studies.37,45–46 Although, there is a possibility that, those unable to be contacted because of mobility or lack of telephone line may differ from the respondents in their use of dental services.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results revealed the positive relationship between insurance and demand for dental care. Those having dental insurance were more likely to go to check-ups despite their generally low rate found in this country with a developing oral health care system. In such countries, health insurance schemes should therefore include obligatory regular dental checkups to emphasize prevention-oriented dental care.
  31 in total

1.  Validity of telephone interview data for vascular disease risk factors in a racially mixed urban community: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study.

Authors:  D E Kargman; R L Sacco; B Boden-Albala; M C Paik; W A Hauser; S Shea
Journal:  Neuroepidemiology       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Utilization of dental services in Southern China.

Authors:  E C Lo; H C Lin; Z J Wang; M C Wong; E Schwarz
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Determining dental checkup frequency.

Authors:  M W Woolfolk; W P Lang; W S Borgnakke; G W Taylor; D L Ronis; L V Nyquist
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.634

4.  Oral health knowledge, attitudes and behaviour of adults in China.

Authors:  Ling Zhu; Poul Erik Petersen; Hong-Ying Wang; Jin-You Bian; Bo-Xue Zhang
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Changes in demand for dental care among Danish adults, 1975-90.

Authors:  E Schwarz
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.331

6.  Utilization of dental services: 1986 patterns and trends.

Authors:  R A Hayward; H K Meetz; M F Shapiro; H E Freeman
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.821

7.  The demand for dental care: evidence from a randomized trial in health insurance.

Authors:  W G Manning; H L Bailit; B Benjamin; J P Newhouse
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.634

8.  Inequities in health: dental insurance coverage and use of dental services among older Ontario adults.

Authors:  D Locker; J L Leake
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr

9.  Dental check-up frequency: preferences of Dutch patients.

Authors:  B C Schouten; T G Mettes; W Weeda; J Hoogstraten
Journal:  Community Dent Health       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.349

10.  Do check-up intervals correspond to caries indices in the free public dental service in Helsinki, Finland?

Authors:  Seppo K J Helminen; Miira M Vehkalahti
Journal:  Community Dent Health       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.349

View more
  18 in total

1.  Association between socioeconomic status and oral health behaviors: The 2008-2010 Korea national health and nutrition examination survey.

Authors:  Jun-Beom Park; Kyungdo Han; Yong-Gyu Park; Youngkyung Ko
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Knowledge and Practice of Oral Cancer Screening in Teaching Faculty-Comparison of Specialty and Year of Clinical Experience.

Authors:  Shintaro Kogi; John DaSilva; Yusuke Mikasa; Cliff Lee; Shigemi Ishikawa-Nagai; Qian Yang; Hidemichi Kihara; Ryosuke Abe; Hiroyuki Yamada
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Comparison of Practices, Knowledge, Confidence, and Attitude toward Oral Cancer among Oral Health Professionals between Japan and Australia.

Authors:  Satoru Haresaku; Michiko Makino; Seiichi Sugiyama; Toru Naito; Rodrigo Jose Mariño
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Does dental insurance make a difference in type of service received by Iranian dentate adults?

Authors:  Fariborz Bayat; Heikki Murtomaa; Miira M Vehkalahti; Heikki Tala
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2011-01

5.  The influence of mothers' lifestyle and health behavior on their children: an exploration for oral health.

Authors:  Keramat Nourijelyani; Mir Saeed Yekaninejad; Mohammad Reza Eshraghian; Kazem Mohammad; Abbas Rahimi Foroushani; Amir Pakpour
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 0.611

6.  Psychosocial determinants of dental service utilization among adults: Results from a population-based survey (Urban HEART-2) in Tehran, Iran.

Authors:  Hoda Bahramian; Simin Z Mohebbi; Mohammad R Khami; Mohsen Asadi-Lari; Ahmad R Shamshiri; Hossein Hessari
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

7.  APPRAISAL OF ACCESS TO DENTAL SERVICES IN SOUTH EAST OF IRAN USING FIVE AS MODEL.

Authors:  Mahmood Moosazadeh; Mohammadreza Amiresmaili; Sara Karimi; Mahboobeh Arabpoor; Mahdi Afshari
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2016-06-01

8.  Sociodemographic and health-related risk factors associated with tooth loss among adults in Rhode Island.

Authors:  Yongwen Jiang; Catherine A Okoro; Junhie Oh; Deborah L Fuller
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Pure and social disparities in distribution of dentists: a cross-sectional province-based study in Iran.

Authors:  Aliasghar A Kiadaliri; Reza Hosseinpour; Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli; Ulf-G Gerdtham
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Prevalence and predictors for periodontitis among adults in China, 2010.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Zhixin Li; Chunxiao Wang; Tao Shen; Yang Yang; Saipin Chotivichien; Linhong Wang
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.