Literature DB >> 19212384

Darwin 200: Should scientists study race and IQ? NO: Science and society do not benefit.

Steven Rose1.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19212384     DOI: 10.1038/457786a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


× No keyword cloud information.
  13 in total

1.  The arrogance of trying to sum up abilities in a number.

Authors:  David Colquhoun
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Identifying adaptive differences could provide insight.

Authors:  Kathryn Holt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The belief that genes cannot be changed is now outdated.

Authors:  Gerhard Meisenberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A useful way to glean social information.

Authors:  Wendy M Williams; Stephen J Ceci
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Would you wish the research undone?

Authors:  Jim Flynn
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Measured intelligence is a product of social processes.

Authors:  David Gillborn
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Darwin, race and gender.

Authors:  Steven Rose
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 8.807

8.  Editors' overview: forbidding science?

Authors:  Gary E Marchant; Stephanie J Bird
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Let's celebrate human genetic diversity.

Authors:  Bruce T Lahn; Lanny Ebenstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Research into group differences isn't wrong, just pointless.

Authors:  Steven Rose
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.