Literature DB >> 19212338

Prognostic significance of minimal residual disease in infants with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated within the Interfant-99 protocol.

V H J Van der Velden1, L Corral, M G Valsecchi, M W J C Jansen, P De Lorenzo, G Cazzaniga, E R Panzer-Grümayer, M Schrappe, A Schrauder, C Meyer, R Marschalek, L L Nigro, M Metzler, G Basso, G Mann, M L Den Boer, A Biondi, R Pieters, J J M Van Dongen.   

Abstract

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in infants younger than 1 year is a rare but relatively homogeneous disease ( approximately 80% MLL gene rearranged, approximately 70% CD10-negative) when compared with childhood and adult ALL. Several studies in children and adults with ALL have shown that minimal residual disease (MRD) status is a strong and independent prognostic factor. We therefore evaluated the prognostic significance of MRD in infant ALL. Ninety-nine infant patients treated according to the Interfant-99 protocol were included in this study. MRD was analyzed by real-time quantitative PCR analysis of rearranged immunoglobulin genes, T-cell receptor genes and MLL genes at various time points (TP) during therapy. Higher MRD levels at the end of induction (TP2) and consolidation (TP3) were significantly associated with lower disease-free survival. Combined MRD information at TP2 and TP3 allowed recognition of three patients groups that significantly differed in outcome. All MRD-high-risk patients (MRD levels > or =10(-4) at TP3; 26% of patients) relapsed. MRD-low-risk patients (MRD level <10(-4) at both TP2 and TP3) constituted 44% of patients and showed a relapse-rate of only 13%, whereas remaining patients (MRD-medium-risk patients; 30% of patients) had a relapse rate of 31%. Comparison between the current Interfant-06 stratification at diagnosis and the here presented MRD-based stratification showed that both stratifications recognized different subgroups of patients. These data indicate that MRD diagnostics has added value for recognition of risk groups in infant ALL and that MRD diagnostics can be used for treatment intervention in infant ALL as well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19212338     DOI: 10.1038/leu.2009.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


  41 in total

1.  MLL-rearranged B lymphoblastic leukemias selectively express the immunoregulatory carbohydrate-binding protein galectin-1.

Authors:  Przemyslaw Juszczynski; Scott J Rodig; Jing Ouyang; Evan O'Donnell; Kunihiko Takeyama; Wojciech Mlynarski; Katarzyna Mycko; Tomasz Szczepanski; Anna Gaworczyk; Andrei Krivtsov; Joerg Faber; Amit U Sinha; Gabriel A Rabinovich; Scott A Armstrong; Jeffery L Kutok; Margaret A Shipp
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Minimal residual disease analysis by eight-color flow cytometry in relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Leonid Karawajew; Michael Dworzak; Richard Ratei; Peter Rhein; Giuseppe Gaipa; Barbara Buldini; Giuseppe Basso; Ondrej Hrusak; Wolf-Dieter Ludwig; Günter Henze; Karl Seeger; Arend von Stackelberg; Ester Mejstrikova; Cornelia Eckert
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 3.  Minimal residual disease diagnostics in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: need for sensitive, fast, and standardized technologies.

Authors:  Jacques J M van Dongen; Vincent H J van der Velden; Monika Brüggemann; Alberto Orfao
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Flow cytometric detection of minimal residual disease in B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia by using "MRD lite" panel.

Authors:  Tathagata Chatterjee; Venkatesan Somasundaram
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2016-12-16

5.  MLL-rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukaemia stem cell interactions with bone marrow stroma promote survival and therapeutic resistance that can be overcome with CXCR4 antagonism.

Authors:  Edward Allan R Sison; Rachel E Rau; Emily McIntyre; Li Li; Donald Small; Patrick Brown
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 6.  Should minimal residual disease monitoring in acute lymphoblastic leukemia be standard of care?

Authors:  Dario Campana
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 7.  Minimal residual disease detection using flow cytometry: Applications in acute leukemia.

Authors:  T Chatterjee; R S Mallhi; S Venkatesan
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2016-03-29

8.  Blinatumomab for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: The First Bispecific T-Cell Engager Antibody to Be Approved by the EMA for Minimal Residual Disease.

Authors:  Sahra Ali; Alexandre Moreau; Daniela Melchiorri; Jorge Camarero; Filip Josephson; Odoardo Olimpier; Jonas Bergh; Dominik Karres; Kyriaki Tzogani; Christian Gisselbrecht; Francesco Pignatti
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-11-14

9.  The Eleventh International Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Workshop Report: Ponte di Legno, Italy, 6-7 May 2009.

Authors:  A Biondi; A Baruchel; S Hunger; G Masera; K Schmiegelow; M Schrappe; C H Pui
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 11.528

10.  Long-term results of St Jude Total Therapy Studies 11, 12, 13A, 13B, and 14 for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  C H Pui; D Pei; J T Sandlund; R C Ribeiro; J E Rubnitz; S C Raimondi; M Onciu; D Campana; L E Kun; S Jeha; C Cheng; S C Howard; M L Metzger; D Bhojwani; J R Downing; W E Evans; M V Relling
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 11.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.