Literature DB >> 19212237

Implant placement accuracy when using stereolithographic template as a surgical guide: preliminary results.

Saad A Al-Harbi1, Albert Y T Sun.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate implant placement accuracy using the coordinate measure machine (CMM) and to assess how accurate implant angulations and point of entrance can be transferred when using a stereolithographic surgical template as a guide during implant placement.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Angulations, entrance points of 40 implants placed in 6 edentulous jaws using stereolithographic surgical template were evaluated. The angulations were noted in both mesio-distal and bucco-lingual planes. The central axis of each treatment-planned implant was determined using the CMM by locating 3 points along the hollow channel of the drill guide stainless steel sleeve of the stereolithographic surgical template and the central axis of the actual implant, evaluated postsurgically, were determined. Three points along the guide pins were noted after mounted to the implant fixture analogs on the working cast. The differences between the proposed and actual implant point of entrance and angulations were calculated and the data were analyzed using the paired t test.
RESULTS: The mean mesio-distal angle deviation of the actual implant from the planned position was 0.7 +/- 5.02 degrees, and the mean bucco-lingual angle deviation was 0.46 +/- 4.43 degrees. Thirty implants (88%) and 31 implants (91%) recorded a <7 degrees angle deviation for the mesio-distal and bucco-lingual plane angle, respectively. No statistical significant difference was found for the angle deviation. The mean difference of the entrance point was within 0.2 +/- 0.72 mm, 29 implants (85%) were within <1 mm from the intended position. Statistically significant difference was shown for the entrance point deviation.
CONCLUSION: When measured using the CMM, the stereolithographic surgical template was sufficiently accurate in transferring the planned implant position to the surgical field relative to the implant angulations and point of entrance. Further clinical studies using a greater number of patients are needed to confirm the results of this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19212237     DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31818c6a50

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Implant Dent        ISSN: 1056-6163            Impact factor:   2.454


  6 in total

1.  Implant Bed Preparation with an Erbium, Chromium Doped Yttrium Scandium Gallium Garnet (Er,Cr: YSGG) Laser Using Stereolithographic Surgical Guide.

Authors:  Gülin Seymen; Zeynep Turgut; Gizem Berk; Ayşen Bodur
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013

2.  Integration of 3D anatomical data obtained by CT imaging and 3D optical scanning for computer aided implant surgery.

Authors:  Gianni Frisardi; Giacomo Chessa; Sandro Barone; Alessandro Paoli; Armando Razionale; Flavio Frisardi
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 1.930

3.  Accuracy of half-guided implant placement with machine-driven or manual insertion: a prospective, randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Kristof Orban; Endre Varga; Peter Windisch; Gabor Braunitzer; Balint Molnar
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 3.606

4.  Accuracy Evaluation of a Stereolithographic Surgical Template for Dental Implant Insertion Using 3D Superimposition Protocol.

Authors:  Corina Marilena Cristache; Silviu Gurbanescu
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2017-05-07

Review 5.  Accuracy of Guided Surgery via Stereolithographic Mucosa-Supported Surgical Guide in Implant Surgery for Edentulous Patient: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cheongbeom Seo; Gintaras Juodzbalys
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2018-03-31

6.  Drill Bit Guiding System for Implant Placement.

Authors:  Loganathan Deepanandan; Giridhar Karthikrajan
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018 Jul-Dec
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.