Literature DB >> 19212176

Sphincter preservation in low rectal cancer is facilitated by preoperative chemoradiation and intersphincteric dissection.

Martin R Weiser1, Hak-Mien Quah, Jinru Shia, José G Guillem, Philip B Paty, Larissa K Temple, Karyn A Goodman, Bruce D Minsky, W Douglas Wong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate oncologic outcome in patients with locally advanced distal rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiation followed by low anterior resection (LAR)/stapled coloanal anastomosis, LAR/intersphincteric dissection/hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis, or abdominoperineal resection (APR). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Distal rectal cancer presents a surgical challenge, and the goals of treatment often include tumor eradication without sacrifice of the anal sphincters. The technique of intersphincteric resection removes the internal anal sphincter to gain additional distal rectal margin in hopes of avoiding a permanent stoma.
METHODS: We analyzed 148 patients with stage II and III rectal cancers (endorectal ultrasound staged uT3-4 and/or uN1) located < or =6 cm from the anal verge, treated by preoperative chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision from 1998 to 2004. Eighty-five patients (57%) had sphincter-preserving resection (41, LAR/stapled coloanal anastomosis; 44, LAR/intersphincteric resection/hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis); 63 patients had APR.
RESULTS: Patients undergoing APR were older, with more poorly differentiated tumors evidencing less response to chemoradiation and more likely to require extended resection. Complete resection with negative histologic margins was achieved in 92%; circumferential margins were positive in 2 (5%) of 44 in the intersphincteric resection group and 8 (13%) of 63 in the APR group. Distal margins were positive in 2 (5%) of 44 in the intersphincteric resection group. With median follow-up of 47 months, there were a total of 7 local recurrences (5%): 1, 0, and 6 in the stapled anastomosis, intersphincteric resection, and APR groups, respectively. Estimated 5-year recurrence-free survival for the stapled anastomosis, intersphincteric resection, and APR groups were 85%, 83%, and 47% respectively (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In low rectal cancer, sphincter preservation is facilitated by a significant response to preoperative chemoradiation and intersphincteric resection, without compromise of margins or outcome. In those who have a less favorable response, abdominoperineal resection is more likely to be required and is associated with poorer outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19212176     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318195e17c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  69 in total

1.  Superiority of laparoscopic rectal surgery: Towards a new era.

Authors:  Yosuke Fukunaga
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-27

2.  Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Sang Woo Lim; Jung Wook Huh; Young Jin Kim; Hyeong Rok Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Completely abdominal intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer: feasibility and comparison of robot-assisted and open surgery.

Authors:  Jin C Kim; Seok-B Lim; Yong S Yoon; In J Park; Chan W Kim; Chang N Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Proximal and distal rectal cancers differ in curative resectability and local recurrence.

Authors:  Wasantha Wijenayake; Mahendra Perera; Jayantha Balawardena; Raeed Deen; S Ruwan Wijesuriya; Sumudu K Kumarage; Kemal I Deen
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-08-27

5.  Surgery: neoadjuvant chemoradiation and sphincter preservation.

Authors:  Vincenzo Valentini; Francesco Cellini
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 46.802

6.  Effectiveness of a transanal tube for the prevention of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Hideaki Nishigori; Masaaki Ito; Yuji Nishizawa; Yusuke Nishizawa; Akihiro Kobayashi; Masanori Sugito; Norio Saito
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Intersphincteric Resection Pushing the Envelope for Sphincter Preservation.

Authors:  Quentin Denost; Eric Rullier
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

8.  Wound dehiscence after abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer is associated with decreased survival.

Authors:  Alexander T Hawkins; David L Berger; Paul C Shellito; Patrica Sylla; Liliana Bordeianou
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 9.  Current issues in locally advanced colorectal cancer treated by preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  In Ja Park; Chang Sik Yu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  What is the significance of the circumferential margin in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy?

Authors:  Atthaphorn Trakarnsanga; Mithat Gonen; Jinru Shia; Karyn A Goodman; Garrett M Nash; Larissa K Temple; José G Guillem; Philip B Paty; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Martin R Weiser
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.