Literature DB >> 19211948

Swimming performance after passive and active recovery of various durations.

Argyris G Toubekis1, Argiro Tsolaki, Ilias Smilios, Helen T Douda, Thomas Kourtesis, Savvas P Tokmakidis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the effects of active and passive recovery of various durations after a 100-m swimming test performed at maximal effort.
METHODS: Eleven competitive swimmers (5 males, 6 females, age: 17.3 +/- 0.6 y) completed two 100-m tests with a 15-min interval at a maximum swimming effort under three experimental conditions. The recovery between tests was 15 min passive (PAS), 5 min active, and 10 min passive (5ACT) or 10 min active and 5 min passive (10ACT). Self-selected active recovery started immediately after the first test, corresponding to 60 +/- 5% of the 100-m time. Blood samples were taken at rest, 5, 10, and 15 min after the first as well as 5 min after the second 100-m test for blood lactate determination. Heart rate was also recorded during the corresponding periods.
RESULTS: Performance time of the first 100 m was not different between conditions (P > .05). The second 100-m test after the 5ACT (64.49 +/- 3.85 s) condition was faster than 10ACT (65.49 +/- 4.63 s) and PAS (65.89 +/- 4.55 s) conditions (P < .05). Blood lactate during the 15-min recovery period between the 100-m efforts was lower in both active recovery conditions compared with passive recovery (P < .05). Heart rate was higher during the 5ACT and 10ACT conditions compared with PAS during the 15-min recovery period (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: Five minutes of active recovery during a 15-min interval period is adequate to facilitate blood lactate removal and enhance performance in swimmers. Passive recovery and/or 10 min of active recovery is not recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19211948     DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.3.3.375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Physiol Perform        ISSN: 1555-0265            Impact factor:   4.010


  6 in total

1.  Tracking the performance of world-ranked swimmers.

Authors:  Mário J Costa; Daniel A Marinho; Victor M Reis; António J Silva; Mário C Marques; José A Bragada; Tiago M Barbosa
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Effects of between-set interventions on neuromuscular function during isokinetic maximal concentric contractions of the knee extensors.

Authors:  Carole Cometti; Gaelle Deley; Nicolas Babault
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Effect of in- versus out-of-water recovery on repeated swimming sprint performance.

Authors:  Martin Buchheit; Hani Al Haddad; Arnaud Chivot; Pierre Marie Leprêtre; Said Ahmaidi; Paul B Laursen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  Does electrical stimulation enhance post-exercise performance recovery?

Authors:  Nicolas Babault; Carole Cometti; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Gaëlle Deley
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Physiological changes in jeju crossbred riding horses by swim training.

Authors:  Ok-Deuk Kang; Youn-Chul Ryu; Young-Min Yun; Min-Soo Kang
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.509

6.  Effect of self-paced active recovery and passive recovery on blood lactate removal following a 200 m freestyle swimming trial.

Authors:  Márcio Rabelo Mota; Renata Aparecida Elias Dantas; Iransé Oliveira-Silva; Marcelo Magalhães Sales; Rafael da Costa Sotero; Patrícia Espíndola Mota Venâncio; Jairo Teixeira Júnior; Sandro Nobre Chaves; Filipe Dinato de Lima
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2017-06-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.