Literature DB >> 19211605

Residual internal limiting membrane in epiretinal membrane surgery.

K Kifuku1, Y Hata, R-i Kohno, S Kawahara, Y Mochizuki, H Enaida, K-h Sonoda, T Ishibashi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: To examine the degree of the residual internal limiting membrane (ILM) after epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling.
METHODS: Sixty-one eyes of 59 patients with ERM were enrolled. After ERM peeling, residual ILM was visualised with Brilliant Blue G (BBG). The residual ILM pattern was divided into three groups: (1) residual type (ILM mostly remained), (2) half type (approximately half of ILM remained), (3) no residual type (ILM mostly removed with ERM). If ILM remained, residual ILM was removed in all cases and histologically examined using the flat mount method in 10 cases. The correlation between the degree of ERM evaluated by preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and residual ILM pattern was also examined.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight eyes (45.9%) were of the residual type. Three eyes (4.9%) were of the half type, and 30 eyes (49.2%) were of no residual type. The mean preoperative BCVA showed no significant correlation with the residual ILM pattern. Flat mount immunohistochemistry revealed many remnant cells, both glial fibrillar acidic protein positive and negative, on residual ILMs in all specimens examined. No recurrence that needed surgical treatment was observed.
CONCLUSION: Residual ILM with remnant cells seems to be frequent after ERM removal. Intraoperative staining with BBG may be helpful in determining the extent of ILM removal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19211605     DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2008.150623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  8 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes of double membrane peeling with or without simultaneous phacoemulsification/gas tamponade for vitreoretinal-interface-associated (VRI) disorders.

Authors:  Kshitiz Kumar; Nisha Chandnani; Pallavi Raj; Amar Agarwal
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 2.  Comparison of the Effectiveness of Pars Plana Vitrectomy with and without Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Idiopathic Retinal Membrane Removal: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hanhan Liu; Shanru Zuo; Chun Ding; Xunzhang Dai; Xiaohua Zhu
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 3.  Chromovitrectomy: an update.

Authors:  Flora Hernández; Natalia Alpizar-Alvarez; Lihteh Wu
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2014-04

4.  Recurrence rate and need for reoperation after surgery with or without internal limiting membrane removal for the treatment of the epiretinal membrane.

Authors:  Fernando José De Novelli; Mauro Goldbaum; Mario Luiz Ribeiro Monteiro; Fabio Bom Aggio; Mario Junqueira Nóbrega; Walter Yukihiko Takahashi
Journal:  Int J Retina Vitreous       Date:  2017-12-11

5.  Macular pucker formation after inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique: Two case reports.

Authors:  Keisuke Kanda; Hiroshi Nakashima; Kazuyuki Emi
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2022-01-20

6.  Presumed Combined Brilliant Blue G and Endolight-Induced Macular Damage following Epiretinal Membrane Removal Surgery.

Authors:  Ramesh Venkatesh; Aditi Gupta; Naresh Kumar Yadav; Jay Chhablani
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-26

7.  Association of preoperative optical coherence tomography markers with residual inner limiting membrane in epiretinal membrane peeling.

Authors:  Gerald Seidel; Martin Weger; Lisa Stadlmüller; Tamara Pichler; Anton Haas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Brilliant Blue G assisted epiretinal membrane surgery.

Authors:  Yüksel Totan; Emre Güler; Mehmet Serdar Dervişoğulları
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.