Literature DB >> 19211586

Would you dope? A general population test of the Goldman dilemma.

J M Connor1, J Mazanov.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test Goldman's dilemma on a general population sample by asking whether they would take the Faustian bargain of a drug that guaranteed sporting success but would result in their death in 5 years' time. Between 1982 and 1995 a bi-annual survey using this dilemma suggested half of all elite athletes would take the drug.
DESIGN: A random telephone survey of 250 members of the Australian general public, with counterbalanced presentation of success and death. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Respondents gave age, gender, sports engagement and response to the dilemma (yes/no).
RESULTS: Only two of a sample of 250 reported they would take the bargain offered by the dilemma.
CONCLUSIONS: Athletes differ markedly from the general population in response to the dilemma. This raises significant practical and ethical dilemmas for athlete support personnel. The psychometry of the dilemma needs to be established more comprehensively for general and athlete populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19211586     DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.057596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  3 in total

Review 1.  Doping in sport: a review of elite athletes' attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge.

Authors:  Jaime Morente-Sánchez; Mikel Zabala
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Trading Health Risks for Glory: A Reformulation of the Goldman Dilemma.

Authors:  Juan Marcos González; F Reed Johnson; Matthew Fedoruk; Joshua Posner; Larry Bowers
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  How to justify a ban on doping?

Authors:  Christof Breitsameter
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 2.903

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.