| Literature DB >> 19210789 |
Milena Cannella1, Vittorio Maglione, Tiziana Martino, Giuseppe Ragona, Luigi Frati, Guo-Min Li, Ferdinando Squitieri.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The expanded CAG repeat in the Huntington's disease (HD) gene may display tissue-specific variability (e.g. triplet mosaicism) in repeat length, the longest mutations involving mitotic (germ and glial cells) and postmitotic (neurons) cells. What contributes to the triplet mutability underlying the development of HD nevertheless remains unknown. We investigated whether, besides the increased DNA instability documented in postmitotic neurons, possible environmental and genetic mechanisms, related to cell replication, may concur to determine CAG repeat mutability. To test this hypothesis we used, as a model, cultured HD patients' lymphoblasts with various CAG repeat lengths.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19210789 PMCID: PMC2645380 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-10-11
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genet ISSN: 1471-2350 Impact factor: 2.103
Demographic characteristics of the patients and genetic characteristics of the lymphoblastoid cell lines in the patients with Huntington's disease.
| Cell lines | No. | Gender | Mean | Mean | Over-time | Mean | Expansions/contractions |
| Lymphoblats with low mutation penetrance | 6 | 3/3 | 40.167 ± 0.983 | 57.250 ± 5.62 | 0.167 ± O.408 | 6.333 ± 1.966a | 1/0 |
| Lymphoblats with usually expanded mutation penetrance | 43 | 22/21 | 45.628 ± 3.471 | 40.643 ± 10.094 | 0.628 ± 0.874 | 7.442 ± 2.797b | 6/11 |
| Lymphoblasts with high mutation penetrance | 9 | 6/3 | 80 ± 21.042 | 12.750 ± 8.396 | 3.429 ± 1.512 | 15.429 ± 11.238c | 6/3 |
| Total | 58 | 31/27 | 50.397 ± 15.416 | 37.741 ± 14.819 | 0.929 ± 1.333 | 8.321 ± 5.250 | 13/14 |
Greater CAG repeat expansions are associated with a larger number of CAG repeat changes (i.e. expansion/contraction events) in passaged lymphoblasts. DNA from passaged lymphoblasts with highest expansions of 60 CAG repeats or more causing juvenile Huntington's disease shows a greater maximum number of peaks (p > 0.001; c vs a and b) indicating the largest triplet mosaicism and a larger number of expansion events (d) than other cell lines.
Figure 1Instable cell lines with (ΔCAG ≥ 5) and stable cell lines with no or small (ΔCAG ≤ 3) CAG repeat variation in dependence on expanded CAG repeat number and mosaicism. A, Expansion CAG mutations are significantly larger in instable cell lines with ΔCAG ≥ 5 (n = 55; 89.4 ± 11.1 CAG) than in those with ΔCAG ≤ 3 (n = 55; 46.6 ± 0.10 CAG). B, Relationship between ΔCAG magnitude and expanded CAG repeat number. Groups 0, 1, 2, 3 and 5 represent cell lines with a ΔCAG value of 0, 1, 2, 3, and ≥ 5 repeats, respectively. The higher ΔCAG magnitude, the more significant is the statistical difference with Group 0-cell lines. Groups 2, 3 and 5 all showed a significant difference vs Group 0 (p-values = 0.0009, 0.0041 and < 0.0001, respectively). C, The mosaicism level, calculated by counting the maximum number of peaks, is significantly lower for stable cell lines with no or small repeat variation (n = 55, 7.4 ± 2.8 peaks and ΔCAG ≤ 3), than for those with large CAG changes (n = 5, 29.9 ± 13.7 and ΔCAG ≥ 5). D, The mosaicism level in dependence on ΔCAG: Samples with more than 80 CAG and about 40 peaks excluded as outliers to avoid a possible bias. Cell lines with large ΔCAG variations ≥ 5 CAG repeats showed an increased number of peaks and mosaicism vs each of the other groups with lower CAG variation (p-values = 0.0003, 0.0007, 0.0086 vs cell lines with ΔCAG = 0, 1 and 2 repeats, respectively). Diamonds in panels B, C and D represent outliers. Standard deviation is reported at the top of each bar.
Figure 2Drug treatment in lymphoblastoid cells with a highly expanded mutation. A and B, Two untreated highly expanded and prone-to-expand cell lines (panel A: cell line with 80 CAG repeats; panel B: cell line with 74 CAG repeats) show an increased CAG repeat variation. The 6th time yielded two peaks with a large level of mosaicism in both cell lines, in one (A) extended beyond 100 CAG repeats. Treatment with ethidium bromide (EB), ethylmethanesulphonate (EMS) and mitomycin C (Mit-C) progressively restricted the mosaicism and the expanded triplet variation in both cell lines. C, Mosaicism variation in treated and untreated cell lines. Untreated cell lines significantly increased their mosaicism degree observed at time 6 vs time 0 (*p = 0.019, see online/supplementary Table 3). Treated cell lines at time 6 significantly decreased their mosaicism degree vs time 0 (**p < 0.0001, see Additional file 1). Degree of mosaicism: median number of peaks observed at time 0 and 6 from two untreated and treated cell lines carrying large CAG repeat expansions. Statistical analysis performed by ANOVA. EB = ethidium bromide, EMS = ethylmethanesulphonate; Mit-C = mitomycin C.